- Posts: 390
Devo7e work
- domcars0
- Offline
Yes you have to keep your finger on the trim to be sure to toogle from pos to neg or from neg to pos ...but as you say : it's 'better than none' and from my point of view it's a cut replacement to the "solder a new switch hard mod".cmpang wrote: yes I followed your setting and able to get an anologe switch with the Trim.. althought using it as a toggle switch is a bit not convenient.. anyway better than none...
Devo 10 (+7e) owner. It's mine, please don't touch it with your big fingers
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mullson
- Offline
- Posts: 114
Where can I find that version?cmpang wrote: I am now using the version from suv and it worked flawlessly..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmpang
- Offline
- Posts: 296
domcars0 wrote:
Yes you have to keep your finger on the trim to be sure to toogle from pos to neg or from neg to pos ...but as you say : it's 'better than none' and from my point of view it's a cut replacement to the "solder a new switch hard mod".cmpang wrote: yes I followed your setting and able to get an anologe switch with the Trim.. althought using it as a toggle switch is a bit not convenient.. anyway better than none...
keeping the finger on the Trim is no problem as I used to set the trim during a fixed wing flight, especailly during maiden flight..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmpang
- Offline
- Posts: 296
Mullson wrote:
Where can I find that version?cmpang wrote: I am now using the version from suv and it worked flawlessly..
Beware that it is still under development and not a formal release, use it causiously:
www.rctw.net/attachment.php?aid=860370
should you get "Protocol Error" then also add this :
www.rctw.net/attachment.php?aid=857743
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mullson
- Offline
- Posts: 114
So if I get protocol error I install the older protocols? Or what do you mean? Are you getting protocol errors?
Thanks again.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cmpang
- Offline
- Posts: 296
Mullson wrote: Thanks! Took awhile to get it down in one pieace. Im going to install it later or tomorrow.
So if I get protocol error I install the older protocols? Or what do you mean? Are you getting protocol errors?
Thanks again.
you simply upgrade with the 2.3.8.1 and as usual, also copy the associated filesystem. Just in case you get an protocol error then you have to copy the attached protocol folder.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RoGuE_StreaK
- Offline
- Posts: 486
TX is currently stock, ie. no power mod or switch mod. I've set the AIL, ELE, and RUD to be ready for D/R as I will probably add a D/R switch in the near future, once I'm running Deviation.
Intended settings:
- Ail & Ele: Expo, -100 to +100, 30% expo, 100% scale. D/R but not enabled.
- Rud: 1-to-1, 100% scale. D/R but not enabled.
- Throttle: FMOD0 = 3point of -100, +40, +100
FMOD1 = 3point of +100, +70, +100
- Pitch: FMOD0 = 3point of -20, +20, +50
FMOD1 = 3point of -50, 0, +50
- Gyro: FMOD0 = Fixed of 40%
FMOD1 = Fixed of 50% (will probably change this)
Ail, Ele, Rud and Pitch should have Safety set to Hold1 with 0, Throttle Safety set to Hold1 with -100
How does that sound? Does my config look to achieve these figures? I've been struggling to come to grips with the interface method and some of the concepts behind it, so if I've gotten it right I may write some 7E/10 specific documentation to help noobs like me.
PS. Is a -100 to +100 range with Scale of 100% and Limit of -150/+150 the same as 100% travel in the Walkera firmware, or is it over-extending the travel? ie. should the limit be reduced to -100/+100, or alternatively a scale of 67% applied?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FDR
- Offline
I've recently got a SuperCP, and 100% throttle gives way too much head speed for my taste.
I've lowered it to the 60% range, but I use it only indoor...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RoGuE_StreaK
- Offline
- Posts: 486
I'd like to auto-rotate, but it's not possible with a motor-driven tail is it? ie. no way to cut the main motor but keep the tail going to stop spinning?
I use mine almost exclusively outdoors and head speed doesn't seem to high for me; though as per my last query, does the -150/+150 Limit give a different result than the stock firmware? ie. does your 60% with -150/+150 equate to a stock firmware 90%?
As a side thought, if I'm using an unmodified module I should actually be using a setting of 150mW instead of 10mW, correct?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FDR
- Offline
The limit won't change the values. The scale does.
My 60% is an equivalent of 80% of the original...
Yep, 150mW recommended...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RoGuE_StreaK
- Offline
- Posts: 486
I never had a TX with throttle-hold when I was flying my King II, so never got to test it out. Undecided as to whether I'll bother fixing it and adding a DSM2 RX, or just get it operational and try to flog it off.FDR wrote: You can't autorotate with this small helis, even with the servo tail ones.
I thought I've seen people say about greater than 100% travel settings; how do you achieve this? I just tried and it wouldn't let me put in figures greater then +100 / less than -100? This made mee think the end result was a factor of the range, scale, and limit.FDR wrote: The limit won't change the values. The scale does.
Ah, took me a while to click to what you were saying; that on the -100 to +100 range, +60 is the equivalent of 80% on the 0-100% range of the stock Walkera firmware.FDR wrote: My 60% is an equivalent of 80% of the original...
I did actually remember this bit when doing my curves, ie. the gyro at +40 is the equivalent of 70%, and my mid-stick on the idle-up curve of +70 is the equivalent of 85%.
As a side note, the majority of guys in the SuperCP thread at rcgroups are going for higher head speeds and lower pitch travel, in an attempt to reduce bogging. I still need to do a lot of experimentation, but the slight changes I've made seem to have made an improvement for me so far.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mullson
- Offline
- Posts: 114
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mullson
- Offline
- Posts: 114
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FDR
- Offline
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Xermalk
- Offline
- Posts: 181
Voltage reading is of again. My 7E reports 3.76V on a pack that is 5.03V according to my multimeter.
Edit: could be one of my batterys, its reporting 6.02V with only the charger connected. Going to replace them now and report back.
Swapped out the batterys to a set of varta nimh's and now its reporting 4.75V instead of 4.99.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- sbstnp
- Offline
- Posts: 649
Xermalk wrote: Swapped out the batterys to a set of varta nimh's and now its reporting 4.75V instead of 4.99.
Could be because of the load. That's small of a difference.
Devo 10 + 4in1
FrSky Taranis + TBS Crossfire
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Xermalk
- Offline
- Posts: 181
sbstnp wrote:
Xermalk wrote: Swapped out the batterys to a set of varta nimh's and now its reporting 4.75V instead of 4.99.
Could be because of the load. That's small of a difference.
Yeah most likely. I got somewhat supprised by the fact that my tx lost 1v in the reading though 1 minute after having flashed it.
I was in the process of setting up a new config file when it started warning for low bat.
One of my powerbase nimh's must have gone bad or something. Checking them with a multimeter gives, 1.27, 1.27 , 1.26 , 1.22v.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mullson
- Offline
- Posts: 114
At the moment shitty BTY 2500 but I will get eneloop 2000 in a few days.FDR wrote: What batteries do you use?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Xermalk
- Offline
- Posts: 181
At ~5.01v the tx reading drops below 4v and the cannot save error shows up again.
If i charge the battery for 5 minutes so that the pack is at 5.08 the tx reads 4.8v with a tx power of 30mw.
Edit: a set of batterys at 5.31v reads 5.15V
Going to leave it on and see what happens.
Edit 2:
Pack 3 of 4xAA NiMh
5.02v -> 3.77V in the tx. Works just fine as long as the pack stays above 5.08v or so.
Thats three sets of different branded NiMh that end up with strange voltage readings and the cannot save error message.
Theres definetly something fishy going on in the above build. I was wondering why i only somethimes could hear the static from the speaker. But it seems that for some reason the radio module dosn't turn on properly.
I reverted back to the old trusty b76ac7445568. And no issues with battery reading, or a devo module that dosn't turn on.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- heliaddict
- Offline
- Posts: 35
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Development
- Devo7e work