Automated voice pack building

More
03 Mar 2019 15:16 #73155 by bd-flyer
Can not bind with the bayang protocol was created by bd-flyer
I could not bind with the bayang protocol using any nightly builds uploaded currently.
The nightly build on February 15 (775e50) has no problem.
I am using T8sg V2 plus.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2019 16:18 #73158 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Can not bind with the bayang protocol
Confirmed, I'm trying to find what went wrong.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2019 17:31 #73159 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Can not bind with the bayang protocol
If you wait long enough (1 minute ?) it binds, still trying to identify the problem.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2019 17:50 #73161 by yets
Replied by yets on topic Automated voice pack building
Is this the build that includes the new Aux channel modification?

I think it's to do with the new Analogue Channel, it only binds when certain parameters are met (telemetry defined on tx and analog define in silverware). I could be wrong but those without updating the Silverware to the best build may have issues

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2019 18:17 #73162 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Automated voice pack building
No, it's not been merged yet, I'm analyzing the problem, it has something to do with deviation, not the protocol itself.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2019 18:22 #73163 by yets
Replied by yets on topic Automated voice pack building
Ahh ok Goebish. I have been trying to build from docker for a few days now and have issues with binding also but I thought it was because of the Bayang protocol I had modified with the new analog changes.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2019 19:25 #73164 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Automated voice pack building
Problem is probably identified (SPI bus running too slow), should be fixed soon.
The firmware is under heavy rework, bugs are expected, thanks for reporting ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2019 22:21 #73165 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Automated voice pack building
Should be fixed in tomorrow's nightly build.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2019 23:12 #73166 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Automated voice pack building
... or right now if you're using docker

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Mar 2019 00:04 #73167 by bd-flyer
Replied by bd-flyer on topic Automated voice pack building
I sincerely appreciate your swift action.
I will try it tomorrow.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Mar 2019 00:27 #73168 by yets
Replied by yets on topic Automated voice pack building
Thank you Goebish, great news.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Mar 2019 02:04 - 04 Mar 2019 02:06 #73172 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Automated voice pack building
@yets, I just merged the extra analog channels patch (CH13 & 14), I only checked that it doesn't break the standard protocol, it has to be enabled in protocol options, same as telemetry, please report.
Last edit: 04 Mar 2019 02:06 by goebish.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Mar 2019 12:40 #73191 by bd-flyer
Replied by bd-flyer on topic Automated voice pack building
I tried the nightly build uploaded on March 4th.
The binding using the bayang protocol succeeded and my drones(B03 Silverware) flew well without problems.
Thank you sooo much, Goebish!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Mar 2019 12:41 #73192 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Automated voice pack building
you're welcome!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.053 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum