- Posts: 28
Massive amount of questions
- Leather Lung
- Topic Author
- Offline
If I download these software programs I will be able to fly or bind with basically any mini or micro helicopter that is to small to have a receiver right? ie... WL toys, Hisky. I did find a post here that I thought was for a V911 and it required wiring a transmitter into the radio. Any help would be great. Thanks from a new rc guy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
In my opinion, using a real Tx (be it a Turnigy or Walkera) makes a huge difference in being able to get the most out of your model, be it 4, or 6 channels). Having the ability to program rates the way you like and have good quality gimbals makes controlling your model much easier.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chrisdank
- Offline
- Posts: 5
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Leather Lung
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 28
What brands use dsm2?
What brands use dsmx?
Could I remove the hardware from my current WL Toys V911 TX and soldering it into my DEVO Tx.
At what point do you purchase a receiver and place it on the helicopter, if ever.
This seems like the way to go, much better then purchasing a Speckturm Tx and being limited in your ability to fly various helicopters right?
I'm sure these seems like basic questions but again I'm new and very thankful for the information.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
Yes you can remove the module from your V911 transmitter and install it in your Walkera transmitter (that is running Deviation)
You can run cheap 'OrangeRx' receivers which use DSM2 protocol, but it would be really rare to do that in a micro. Much more likely in a larger helicopter.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Leather Lung
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 28
chrisdank wrote: get the minicp devo 8s bnf package and dive in. mini cp is what i started learning collective on, with the right settings it flys like a dream.. solid tail very tame, good for beginners
So the mini cp BNF and then purchase the devo 8s Tx.
I have also heard good things about the Super cp what do you think?
Where would be a good place to purchase these?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Leather Lung
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 28
Anyway, this is the best way to go right?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chrisdank
- Offline
- Posts: 5
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chrisdank
- Offline
- Posts: 5
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chrisdank
- Offline
- Posts: 5
this is a good deal, i bought from them before... this is a fun little bird, it really got me hooked into this hobby i was able to learn basic 3d almost right away, and if you do crash parts are cheap and easy to replace.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- oregonh20
- Offline
- Posts: 7
I'll give a whack at your questions and a basic history/reason behind this, and let the "pros" correct me where I fall short. PB, FDR others...
Yes, you have seem to have a pretty good grasp of the situation.
Yes, you can cannibalize some of your other equipment for these mods, in some cases.
The point where you start exchanging RXs (receivers) to match your TX (transmitter) becomes time and cost effective after you leave the cheaper, less dangerous and mostly Nano and Micro UAV "RTF" (ready to fly) and "ARF" (almost ready to fly) models.
Finding a compatible TX/FC (Flight Controller)/RX combo for each model is disproportionately large investment to the original cost of the model in terms of knowledge effort and money.
Hence, Deviation; A universal software/hardware solution that runs on a nice line of transmitters that can, which with some mods, becomes a multi RX/Protocol compatibiltiy solution.
Here is an incomplete and rough list that I have cobbled together from various sources of potentially Deviation compatible protocols and chips: Note that Devo runs the CYRF6936 natively.
Please double check:
Manufacturer, Protocol Transceiver
Walkera, DEVO, CYRF6936
Walkera, WK2x01, CYRF6936
JR/Spektrum, DSM2/DSMX, CYRF6936
???, J6Pro , CYRF6936
FlySky, Flysky, A7105
Hubsan, Hubsan, A7105
???, Skyartec, CC2500
Frsky, Frsky1, CC2500
Frsky, Frsky2, CC2500
???, V202, NRF24L01 / BK2423
???, V922, NRF24L01E
???, NE260, NRF24L01
???, AnyLink, NRF24L01
Essentially, this is an older sport/hobby that had a fairly limited technology and audience, that has exploded, because of access to newer, more efficient technologies; like batteries; micro electronics; RF frequency availability and a flood of companies selling "comparatively" very inexpensive gear.
This flood creates a fractured landscape of technologies, with many different and some very untested or non robust designs. This is apparent more in the beginner space than anywhere else.
Because Nano and Micro UAVs tend to be so cheap and there is Market share advantage to having incompatible systems the manufacturer includes their own solution of the cheapest FC/RX combo he can source and a $10 transmitter that works.
Safety and reliability issues:
As long as you are playing with Micro/Nano UAVs losing your UAV is about as bad as it gets, however when you move up to the larger UAVs with larger motors, weights and propellers things start to become more risky, the potential for injuries or even death become a distinct possibility.
Then comes the new enduser that has more than one type model and wants a single robust transmitter that will run all of his gear.
The questions that you ask are the ones that I assume most of us have asked at one point or another.
I'm fairly new to all RC stuff myself and it has taken many hours of research and reading to get what I know figured out, plus I have a pretty deep technical background in communications, hardware and electronics.
Good luck and welcome aboard!
OH2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- robca
- Offline
- Posts: 174
If you cannibalize your toy Tx, you won't be able to sell your toy RTF quad when you are bored with it (or hand it over to a friend/nephew/kid). Also, having the original radio still working helps immensely in troubleshooting problems with the Devo programming and your module soldering. Last but not least, if you damage the cannibalized module when soldering, you won't fly , while if you damage a cheap eBay module, you can keep flying with the original Tx. For what is worth, soldering a module is an easy soldering task, no SMD skills required
I recently installed the A7105 module in my Devo 7e, and my Hubsan x4 is a completely new (and 10 times better) quad. I never realized how bad the original Tx was until I tried the X4 with the Devo 7e.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Leather Lung
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 28
And is the DEvo8s with mini worth the extra $70.00 Vs DEVO 10 with mini?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tom Z
- Offline
I converted it to brushless using a 10A ESC with the BLheli code.
For a beginner I would stay with the stock motors for less damage in a crash as the motors have less power and rpm than the upgraded motors.
The Mini CP has very bad flight times out of the box, under 2 minutes!
Changing the main gear size, motor, and better battery I am getting 6+ minutes flight time.
The Super CP has very mixed reviews, about 50/50.
But out of the box flight times are much better that the Mini CP,
5-6 Minutes.
Differences between the Mini CP and Super CP are the reciever, servos, motor, canopy.
There are a lot of threads on Mini CP vs Super CP you can check out on Helifreak.com
I have a full detailed review of the Mini CP stock and brushless on my web site.
www.rcproreviews.com/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- linux-user
- Offline
- Posts: 271
see: < deviationtx.com/articles/21-which-devo-tx-should-i-buy >
Super-CP vers. Mini-CP
Chassis and many (most) parts are identical:
different are:
- Motors (main and tail)
- RX
- Servos
With Super-CP the servo electronic has moved into the RX,
thus servos are cheaper.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- victzh
- Offline
- Posts: 1386
oregonh20 wrote: Manufacturer, Protocol Transceiver
???, V202, NRF24L01 / BK2423
???, V922, NRF24L01E
???, NE260, NRF24L01
???, AnyLink, NRF24L01
Some corrections about nRF24 based protocols. It probably makes sense to mention the chip as nRF24L01+, as it is current modification supporting 500kbit/sec data rate and as such, compatible with all other nRF24 chips. This data rate is also supported by BK2423 (as opposed by BK2421, which is a clone of the original nRF24L01).
Also, there is no such chip as nRF24L01E, there is nRF24LE1, which is 8051 SOC with nRF24 RF. It is radio-compatible with nRF24L01+, the problem is that the implementation of protocol in the chip is not easily reversable. If what you mention in your "Transceiver" column are the actual chips, it's OK. If it is what is needed to support the protocol in Deviation, it is wrong.
My table for nRF24 would look like this:
Manufacturer | Protocol | RF Chip to support |
WL-Toys | V202 | nRF24L01+ |
HiSky | V922, a.k.a. HiSky | nRF24L01+ |
Nine Eagle | NE260 | nRF24L01+ |
Tactic | SLT (AnyLink is a device) | nRF24L01+ |
ESky | ESky | nRF24L01+ (in progress) |
Skyline | YD717 | nRF24L01+ |
Bitcraze | Crazyflie | nRF24L01+ (in progress) |
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Leather Lung
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 28
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- oregonh20
- Offline
- Posts: 7
Thank you for the help!
OH2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Daryoon
- Offline
- Posts: 260
Here's a primer if you haven't read it already. It will answer some of you questions.
www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1918045#post25347384
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Leather Lung
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 28
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- General
- General Discussions
- Massive amount of questions