Telemetry bug?
- Tom Z
- Topic Author
- Offline
I posted a question for you but you didn't see the post.
My question:
PhracturedBlue,
You posted that "telemetry is definitely buggy. I can see random values on the telemetry screen when adjusting the throttle."
"I believe I've resolved the issue with corrupt Telemetry".
Is there a bug in the firmware using telemetry and you have resolved it in the nightly build which we all should be using if we want to use telemetry?
deviationtx.com/forum/6-general-discussi...light?start=20#22325
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- linux-user
- Offline
- Posts: 271
Tom Z wrote: PhracturedBlue,
You posted that "telemetry is definitely buggy. I can see random values on the telemetry screen when adjusting the throttle."
"I believe I've resolved the issue with corrupt Telemetry".
Is there a bug in the firmware using telemetry and you have resolved it in the nightly build which we all should be using if we want to use telemetry?
deviationtx.com/forum/6-general-discussi...light?start=20#22325
The current nightly still suffers from issue #533 which makes telemetry somewhat unusable.
V4.0.1 does telemetry very well, as long as you are well within the range for telemetry.
For me, issue #525 in V4.0.1 is (at least partly) related to a hardware problem. See post #21524 .
But V4.0.1 seems to handle corrupt telemetry packets not very well, which may occur if you are close to the range limit for telemetry. See V120d02s-V2 lost binding mid flight .
We definitely need to do more research on telemetry.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tom Z
- Topic Author
- Offline
I have been telling people that the V4.0.1 is the most stable version and there has not been any "reboot in flight" issues that I have seen. I will let people know about the telemetry.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
I haven't had time to look at the telemetry range issue in nightly-builds. I thought they'd been corrected when I fixed the forward-range issue, so I would have expected #533 to be fixed as well, but as I didn't verify it, I can't be sure that is the case. If linux-user says it is still there, it likely is.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- linux-user
- Offline
- Posts: 271
PhracturedBlue wrote: I haven't had time to look at the telemetry range issue in nightly-builds. I thought they'd been corrected when I fixed the forward-range issue, so I would have expected #533 to be fixed as well.
I just did a short telemetry range test with nightly da8682f. (Devo10 - MiniCP)
I could get a telemetry range of ~50m, but the telemetry values tend to become marked invalid very easy, even if I am well within range limit. When telemetry values are marked invalid, they tend to stay invalid for a longer time, but may get valid again some time later.
Update:
Just cross checked with 689090a, which seems to behave the same, so #533 is still there, although the bug may not be exactly a range issue.
V4.0.1 definitely behaves different.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- General
- General Discussions
- Telemetry bug?