- Posts: 15
Lag with 202 protocol but not others with nrf24l01
- doctortim
- Topic Author
- Offline
I'm new to this, and have a problem with lag.
I have just installed a nrf24l01 (one from ebay but with the lna and pa) and am pretty confident about the soldering. I have 4 quads which need this module:
Cheerson cx10 (new version)
JJRC H8 mini
JJRC jj-1000
Tarantula X6
The last 2 use the 202 protocol and suffer from control lag that makes them un-flyable. I can bind no problem but there is roughly a 0.5 to 1.0 second lag in the response. The cx10 and H8 both fly perfectly so I don't know what to think.
I used a ribbon cable to attach the module and I wonder if there is a problem with the current capacity of the thin wires.
I've flashed deviation 4.01 and the most recent nightly 4.01-1194044 and the symptoms are the same.
Any help much appreciated.
thanks.
DrT
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Deal57
- Offline
- Posts: 857
For hardware issues we need to see a photo of the installation with enough detail to see the circuits. Let us know what you find out.
Deviation Devo7e 3way switch mod, A7105, NRF24L01
Devo6s 2x2 switch mod, trim mod, haptic, multimodule, A7105, NRF24L01, CC2500
Devo12e 4-in-1 with voice mod -- it speaks!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Offline
- Posts: 1896
There's a thread somewhere on here about some knockoff nRF chips having a bit reversal bug that affects receiving packets. It could also be a wiring problem on the MISO signal in your nRF install.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- doctortim
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 15
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- doctortim
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 15
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- doctortim
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 15
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- doctortim
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 15
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- doctortim
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 15
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- doctortim
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 15
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Fernandez
- Offline
- Posts: 983
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Deal57
- Offline
- Posts: 857
It's possible the quads you bought came with a different protocol or even chip than was used to create the protocol we use now. Did you have any luck with a barebones model.ini?
Deviation Devo7e 3way switch mod, A7105, NRF24L01
Devo6s 2x2 switch mod, trim mod, haptic, multimodule, A7105, NRF24L01, CC2500
Devo12e 4-in-1 with voice mod -- it speaks!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- doctortim
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 15
The quads are pretty common, I can't see both being so different that nobody else has experienced this.
My feeling is that the nrf24l01 is to blame. Looking at pictures online, it looks quite likely to be fake. Although this doesn't necessarily mean that it doesn't function the same as an original, I've now read a few reports of problems that might be relevant.
I don't know how to start with a barebones model file. Can you help with a link to a tutorial or explain the basics?
thanks,
DrT.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Richard96816
- Offline
- Posts: 208
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- doctortim
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 15
I'll report back with the results when I've received it.
DrT
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- doctortim
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 15
I soldered it in and everything works perfectly, no lag!
I'm now more inclined to think the other one was a fake/clone.
Thanks everyone for the advice.
DrT.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- General
- General Discussions
- Lag with 202 protocol but not others with nrf24l01