1. Forum
  3. Development
  5. Protocol Development
  7. Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja

Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja

More
30 Oct 2014 12:46 - 30 Oct 2014 13:00 #26220 by alibenpeng
Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja was created by alibenpeng
Hi,

I've got me one of these and none of the protocols I've tested so far seems to work (and I've tested all but the "expensive" ones like FrSky or DSMX). The transceiver is nothing I've ever seen before (picture attached) and also completely unmarked. All 2.4GHz transceivers I've seen so far come in TQFP packages, not in SOIC, SOP, or whatever this is.



I've tried to trace data on the SPI bus (or what I believe to be the SPI bus), but they look all broken. The clock signal looks irregular and at ~87kHz it is way too slow for an SPI clock.



Also, those traces were quite hard to capture, as connecting wires to those pins seems to derail the signals and it took quite a few tries to capture a successfull bind, for example. Especially the clock signal seems to be VERY sensitive to the "antenna" that is the LA wire. I had to keep it extremely short to be able to capture anything on it without breaking communications between MCU and transceiver.

Can anybody tell me what I'm looking at, or give me some advice on how to make a proper capture?

Thanks,

Ali
Attachments:
Last edit: 30 Oct 2014 13:00 by alibenpeng.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
30 Oct 2014 20:08 - 30 Oct 2014 20:11 #26228 by btoschi
Replied by btoschi on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Hi,

SeByDocky already captured SPI data for the Eachine H1.
Its using LT8910 RF chip, which is not yet supported by deviation, protocol looks easy to do, I've already analyzed it.

Here is my script to decode LT8910 SPI commands exported from Salae Logic as .csv plus one of the captures from SeByDocky exported to .csv.

File Attachment:

File Name: H1.zip
File Size:310 KB
Attachments:
Last edit: 30 Oct 2014 20:11 by btoschi.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
30 Oct 2014 20:56 #26230 by alibenpeng
Replied by alibenpeng on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
That's great news! There isn't, by any chance, also a capture of the bind sequence, is there? Otherwise I'll have another go at it this weekend. The files you attached will save me a lot of headache with that. Thanks!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
31 Oct 2014 08:57 #26235 by btoschi
Replied by btoschi on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
I have captures of the entire stuff and (somewhere lost on my desktop :P ) scribbles where I've analyzed the format (includig bind sequence) in detail.
I'll search this evening and post details on protocol ... no need to do that work twice.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
31 Oct 2014 13:02 #26238 by alibenpeng
Replied by alibenpeng on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Cool, thank you!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
31 Oct 2014 20:35 - 31 Oct 2014 20:39 #26240 by btoschi
Replied by btoschi on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Okay, here comes my Eachine H1 findings...
RF chip init:
1.2832   0 WRITE REG 0 (00) DATA: 6F E0 STATUS: 81 81
1.2835   1 WRITE REG 1 (01) DATA: 56 81 STATUS: 01 01
1.2839   2 WRITE REG 2 (02) DATA: 66 17 STATUS: 00 00
1.2842   3 WRITE REG 4 (04) DATA: 9C C9 STATUS: 01 01
1.2845   4 WRITE REG 5 (05) DATA: 66 37 STATUS: 01 01
1.2848   5 WRITE 7_RXTX_CHNL (07) DATA: 00 30 STATUS: 01 01
1.2852   6 WRITE REG 8 (08) DATA: 6C 90 STATUS: 01 81
1.2855   7 WRITE 9_PA_CTRL (09) DATA: 48 00 STATUS: 81 81
1.2858   8 WRITE 10_OSC_XTAL_EN (0A) DATA: 7F FD STATUS: 81 81
1.2861   9 WRITE 11_RSSI_PDN (0B) DATA: 00 08 STATUS: 01 00
1.2864  10 WRITE REG 12 (0C) DATA: 00 00 STATUS: 01 01
1.2868  11 WRITE REG 13 (0D) DATA: 48 BD STATUS: 01 01
1.2871  12 WRITE REG 22 (16) DATA: 00 FF STATUS: 01 01
1.2874  13 WRITE 23_VCO_CAL_EN (17) DATA: 80 05 STATUS: 01 01
1.2877  14 WRITE REG 24 (18) DATA: 00 67 STATUS: 01 01
1.2880  15 WRITE REG 25 (19) DATA: 16 59 STATUS: 00 00
1.2884  16 WRITE REG 26 (1A) DATA: 19 E0 STATUS: 01 01
1.2887  17 WRITE REG 27 (1B) DATA: 13 00 STATUS: 01 01
1.2890  18 WRITE REG 28 (1C) DATA: 18 00 STATUS: 01 01
1.2893  19 WRITE 32_AIRFMT (20) DATA: 48 00 STATUS: 01 01
1.2897  20 WRITE REG 33 (21) DATA: 3F C7 STATUS: 01 01
1.2900  21 WRITE REG 34 (22) DATA: 20 00 STATUS: 01 00
1.2903  22 WRITE 35_PWRCONFIG (23) DATA: 03 00 STATUS: 01 81
1.2906  23 WRITE 36_SYNCWORD0 (24) DATA: FD 07 STATUS: 81 80
1.2910  24 WRITE 37_SYNCWORD1 (25) DATA: 55 01 STATUS: 00 01
1.2913  25 WRITE 38_SYNCWORD2 (26) DATA: 02 03 STATUS: 01 01
1.2916  26 WRITE 39_SYNCWORD3 (27) DATA: 04 05 STATUS: 01 01
1.2919  27 WRITE 40_THRESH (28) DATA: 44 02 STATUS: 01 01
1.2923  28 WRITE 41_PKTCONF (29) DATA: B0 00 STATUS: 01 00
1.2926  29 WRITE REG 42 (2A) DATA: FD B0 STATUS: 01 01
1.2929  30 WRITE 43_RSSI (2B) DATA: 00 0F STATUS: 01 01
1.2932  31 READ 36_SYNCWORD0 (A4) DATA: 00 00 STATUS: FF 07
1.2936  32 WRITE 52_TXRX_RWPTRS (34) DATA: 80 80 STATUS: 81 01
1.2939  33 WRITE 7_RXTX_CHNL (07) DATA: 00 8A STATUS: 81 81

Bind packet:
1.3961  366 READ 48_STATUS (B0) DATA: 00 00 STATUS: 1A 16
1.3964  367 WRITE 52_TXRX_RWPTRS (34) DATA: 80 80 STATUS: 12 12
1.3967  368 WRITE 50_TXRX_FIFO (32)
       DATA: 18 a9 dd 7d 09 3c 14 01 fd 00 09 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
     STATUS: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 12 12 10 12 10 1a 12 13
1.3987  369 WRITE 7_RXTX_CHNL (07) DATA: 01 0A STATUS: 12 12
1.3990  370 READ 48_STATUS (B0) DATA: 00 00 STATUS: 81 C0
1.3994  371 WRITE 7_RXTX_CHNL (07) DATA: 00 0A STATUS: 01 01
1.3997  372 WRITE 52_TXRX_RWPTRS (34) DATA: 80 80 STATUS: 01 01
1.4000  373 WRITE 7_RXTX_CHNL (07) DATA: 00 8A STATUS: 01 01

Data packets:
9.6582  76085 WRITE 7_RXTX_CHNL (07) DATA: 01 17 STATUS: 01 01
9.6585  76086 READ 48_STATUS (B0) DATA: 00 00 STATUS: 04 0E
9.6588  76087 READ 48_STATUS (B0) DATA: 00 00 STATUS: 09 40
9.6591  76088 WRITE 7_RXTX_CHNL (07) DATA: 00 17 STATUS: 00 01
9.6612  76089 WRITE 52_TXRX_RWPTRS (34) DATA: 80 80 STATUS: 01 01
9.6615  76090 WRITE 50_TXRX_FIFO (32)
       DATA: 18 49 02 02 09 02 01 02 88 00 00 7f 7f 32 20 40 40 00 d0
     STATUS: 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 81 01
9.6636  76091 WRITE 7_RXTX_CHNL (07) DATA: 01 26 STATUS: 00 81
9.6639  76092 READ 48_STATUS (B0) DATA: 00 00 STATUS: 37 0C
9.6642  76093 READ 48_STATUS (B0) DATA: 00 00 STATUS: 0D 40
9.6645  76094 WRITE 7_RXTX_CHNL (07) DATA: 00 26 STATUS: 01 01
9.6666  76095 WRITE 52_TXRX_RWPTRS (34) DATA: 80 80 STATUS: 01 00
9.6669  76096 WRITE 50_TXRX_FIFO (32)
       DATA: 18 49 02 02 09 03 01 02 88 00 00 7f 7f 32 20 40 40 00 d0
     STATUS: 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 81 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 01
9.6690  76097 WRITE 7_RXTX_CHNL (07) DATA: 01 3C STATUS: 01 01
9.6693  76098 READ 48_STATUS (B0) DATA: 00 00 STATUS: 04 18

Distilled:

Bind sends packets on RF channel 0a and 8a, data is
18 a9 dd 7d 09 3c 14 01 fd 00 09 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
which means 0x18 bytes payload, a9 indicates bind packets, then follows TX ID (not sure, but should be there) which (most propably) affects the RF channels for data phase.

Data sends packets on RF channels 13, 17, 26 and 3C (for this TX ID) which look like
18 49 02 02 09 03 01 02 88 00 00 80 80 32 20 40 40 00 d2
...
18 49 02 02 09 03 01 02 88 00 00 7f 7f 32 20 40 40 00 d0
...
18 49 02 02 09 01 01 02 88 00 00 43 7f 32 20 40 40 00 94
18 49 02 02 09 02 01 02 88 00 00 4c 7f 32 20 40 40 00 9d
18 49 02 02 09 03 01 02 88 00 00 56 7f 32 20 40 40 00 a7
18 49 02 02 09 00 01 02 88 00 00 74 7f 32 20 40 40 00 c5
18 49 02 02 09 01 01 02 88 00 00 7f 7f 32 20 40 40 00 d0
...
You can see last byte is checksum over 9 bytes (?) before (which are channel data),
second byte is 0x49 to mark data packet, sixth byte counts 0-3 between packets.

Since I do not own this quad, I cannot help more w/o more dumps, especially the 'TX ID' in bind packet and the resulting channel sequence are from interest.

Note that the very same LT8910 RF chip can be found in a small quadcopter called 'CX033 Nano' (PSX-Style controller, not really from CX, this one: www.amazon.com/CX033-Wireless-Control-Qu...rcraft/dp/B00M0E1K80 ) and in Eachine CG022 - both I do own. Protocol of these are (both) different, but also mostly understood by me. CX033 Transmitter has small board with LT8910 RF chip on it, which should be easy to transplant for Arduino/Deviation usage.
Last edit: 31 Oct 2014 20:39 by btoschi.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Nov 2014 09:34 - 01 Nov 2014 10:48 #26243 by alibenpeng
Replied by alibenpeng on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Nice work!

I looked at the packet format in search of a possible match within our four "deviated" chips. According to the init sequence it should look like this:

3 Bytes Preamble, either As or 5s,
4 Bytes Address, FD075501 (although registers 38 and 39 are also set, no idea why),
then a mysterious 4 bit trailer, I couldn't find out anything about,
1 byte payload length,
n bytes payload,
2 bytes crc.

And the whole thing is then NRZ encoeded and GFSK modulated. Oh, and the chip only supports 1MBit data rate, it seems.

Out of our "favourite four", the CYRF and the nRF24 are the only ones that have a 1MBit data rate with GFSK modulation, and the nRF24's old, not enhanced, shock burst format looks promisingly close to what we need. The only thing I can't see right now, is how to shoehorn those four trailer bits in there, whatever they might be.


I've also ordered one of these puppies , so I can do what this guy did . That should help a lot with the troubleshooting, if we ever get that far.

The only thing really bugging me is that I can't seem to get a proper SPI capture from my TX. All I get is bs-data, stuff like a MISO line that is always high (it does go low at some point, so it is not shorted to VCC). I've even tried two different logic analyzers with not the same, but equally unusable results. There must be something really fishy going on here, or I have forgotten how to use a logic analyzer overnight.
Last edit: 01 Nov 2014 10:48 by alibenpeng.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Nov 2014 11:25 - 01 Nov 2014 11:26 #26245 by btoschi
Replied by btoschi on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
SeBy mentioned that he also had trouble sniffing traffic on H1 transmitter.
I'll check your setup this evening, sounds like some pins are not really the proper ones :P

Reagarding Down-converter based 2.4GHz sniffing: This will only work until the protocol starts to channel-hop - which is okay in this scenario, but makes its unusable to check any issues with frequency hopping (simply, the SDR cannot switch channels fast enough, as far as I know).

I've thought about emulating it with nRF before, but yet had no idea how to start.

You can send almost anything as _real_ payload (including preambles and headers of LT8910) and just ignore that NRF protocol header and footer being added automagically.
Can make receipting harder for LT chip (in case NRF has similar sync, as it has), but it should sync to its own preambles within ANY random data.
Last edit: 01 Nov 2014 11:26 by btoschi.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Nov 2014 14:46 #26246 by alibenpeng
Replied by alibenpeng on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Good to know I'm not the only one to have difficulties with logic sniffing on this thing. I noticed esp. the CLK line to be extremely sensitive to connecting a logic probe, a.k.a. antenna to it. In most cases the TX failed to work completely with that probe connected, i.e. no beeps after powering on.

Also, the clock frequency in SeBy's captures is also only ~90kHz, as are mine, so that seems to be normal. But it turned out that I also misread the datasheet. Those timings there were the absolute minimums, and there are no maximums specified, so the slow clock shouldn't be a problem.

I don't really grasp the "real payload" bit you're talking about. What else is there apart from the stuff in the "packet format" diagram? I always imagined that when the TX turns on, the transmission starts with the preamble bits and ends with the CRC, and that's it. But I agree, in the end it wouldn't make a difference, unless the LT deploys a similar kind of sorcery.

I'm also still wondering about that misterious 4 bit long trailer, and how to find out what's in there. With that the RTL-SDR sniffing might help, but it'll be a while until the downconverter arrives.

On finding a starting point with the nRF: I will try to bluntly hardcode a bind packet, and just try brute forcing those trailer bits. There are only for of them after all. I don't really expect it to work on the first try, but with the work you already did, I think all the pieces are there.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Nov 2014 15:29 #26247 by alibenpeng
Replied by alibenpeng on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja

btoschi wrote: 

18 a9 dd 7d 09 3c 14 01 fd 00 09 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
which means 0x18 bytes payload, a9 indicates bind packets, then follows TX ID (not sure, but should be there) which (most propably) affects the RF channels for data phase.


Wait, shouldn't there be 24 bytes there?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Nov 2014 19:46 - 01 Nov 2014 19:52 #26254 by btoschi
Replied by btoschi on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Yeah, 0x18 would mean 24 bytes follow, but they only send 0x12 bytes. Eachine CG032 writes 0x0b as length, followed by 0x0b bytes payload (0x0c total), so this is definitely working as expected.
CX033 writes 0x0a first, followed by 0x09 bytes (thus they're writing total bytes including length, which is wrong according to manual).

The datasheet is not very precise there, but for me it looks like a programming bug in H1 transmitter (C-source with 0x18 instead of 18), and I'm pretty sure the LT8910 simply sends out non-initialized data (or zeroes, if the chip is brave) for the missing 6 bytes.

You should be able to see that when sniffing with SDR.
Last edit: 01 Nov 2014 19:52 by btoschi.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Nov 2014 20:07 - 01 Nov 2014 20:11 #26255 by btoschi
Replied by btoschi on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja

alibenpeng wrote: I don't really grasp the "real payload" bit you're talking about. What else is there apart from the stuff in the "packet format" diagram? I always imagined that when the TX turns on, the transmission starts with the preamble bits and ends with the CRC, and that's it.


LT8910 Packets:
Preamble | SYNC | Trailer | Payload | (CRC)
^ 1010... or 0101... matches continuation in first bits of SYNC byte
^ Think of "MAC-Address"

NRF Packets (without Shockburst):
Preamble | Address | Payload
1 byte 3-5bytes 0-32bytes

You can see, NRF packets without enhanced shockburst and LT8910 format are looking very similar besides the 'trailer'.
With ANY RF chip you can send the proper formed packet of LT8910 (Preamble + SYNC + Trailer + Payload + CRC) as "Payload" and all is fine. Only thing stopping you could be maximum allowed packet length.

With NRF you could even misuse the NRF Address to form up the (Preamble+) SYNC bytes (depends on Preamble length) and make the first 4 bits of your payload form the 'trailer' (or missign parts of SYNC). Just pad last byte with "something" (zeroes, randoms, the chips won't care after receiving and decoding a full packet).
Last edit: 01 Nov 2014 20:11 by btoschi.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Nov 2014 12:54 #26260 by alibenpeng
Replied by alibenpeng on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja

btoschi wrote: With ANY RF chip you can send the proper formed packet of LT8910 (Preamble + SYNC + Trailer + Payload + CRC) as "Payload" and all is fine. Only thing stopping you could be maximum allowed packet length.


I get it. The receiver will ignore anything before it's own preamble+address as noise.

btoschi wrote: With NRF you could even misuse the NRF Address to form up the (Preamble+) SYNC bytes (depends on Preamble length) and make the first 4 bits of your payload form the 'trailer' (or missign parts of SYNC). Just pad last byte with "something" (zeroes, randoms, the chips won't care after receiving and decoding a full packet).


That's what I'm trying to do right now.

I've started out with a copy of the YD717 as a template, because I'm already familiar with the protocol and it uses the nRF. I've already adjusted the init sequence to match the settings of the lt8910, set the address length to 5 bytes, the first two being 0xAA, then the first three sync-bytes (0xFD0755).
The first byte of the "real" payload will be the last sync byte (0x01), followed by four trailer bits, and then the original payload + CRC.

Right now I'm working on how to calculate the CRC and then right-shift the packet array by 12 bits, so I can insert the last address byte and the trailer. My C skills aren't the greatest, so that's a bit of a challenge.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Nov 2014 15:00 #26261 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Good to see some people involved with the LT8910 :)... coz other nanoquad & micro can be hacked too. I hope it will be possible to use our "old" nRF24L01 :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Nov 2014 11:21 - 03 Nov 2014 11:22 #26273 by btoschi
Replied by btoschi on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja

alibenpeng wrote: I get it. The receiver will ignore anything before it's own preamble+address as noise.

Exactly.

alibenpeng wrote: My C skills aren't the greatest, so that's a bit of a challenge.

I'm always low on time, but I can help with C/C++/... when needed.

Are you coding (prototyping) with Deviation or using Arduino ?
Latter one is still painful (compared with most of my Linux based toolchains), but slightly faster than compiling and uploading to Devo, mostly thanks to smaller binary size plus automated upload.
Last edit: 03 Nov 2014 11:22 by btoschi.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Nov 2014 14:24 - 04 Nov 2014 19:38 #26282 by alibenpeng
Replied by alibenpeng on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
I'm happy to announce that I've got my first proper SPI capture. It looks promisingly close to SeBy's, down to the syncword in registers 36-39. No idea what made it so hard the first ten times around, but I guess, verifying stuff with the datasheet instead of just assuming I've got the right pins helps.

I've also got the CRC generation and bit shifting of the payload packet working, so I was even able to send a few first (unsuccessfull) bind packets.

What I've done is make the CRC polynomial configurable (only among the 4 most common, not a free 16 bit number) via the model_opts dialog and rotate the trailer with every bind packet that gets sent out.

But without being able to sniff packets from the air, this is about as far as I'll get. Hopefully the down converter gets here soon...

I am coding directly in Deviation, with the emu and lots of debugging, to see if my code even does what it's supposed to, and if I got something worth testing, I flash it to my Devo8. I've used to go the Arduino/AVR route when I built my own PPM modules for the 9X (using/porting Deviation protocol code).

BTW, I've got a Makefile based toolchain for the AVR that includes the Arduino libs. The Arduino IDE just wasn't bearable. I'm a Linux Admin by trade, so, by definition, my coding skills are limited and I feel strongly about the text editor I use. :)
Last edit: 04 Nov 2014 19:38 by alibenpeng.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Nov 2014 20:03 - 06 Nov 2014 20:10 #26303 by alibenpeng
Replied by alibenpeng on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja

btoschi wrote: Bind sends packets on RF channel 0a and 8a, data is

18 a9 dd 7d 09 3c 14 01 fd 00 09 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
which means 0x18 bytes payload, a9 indicates bind packets, then follows TX ID (not sure, but should be there) which (most propably) affects the RF channels for data phase.


I've looked into that, and my findings differ a bit:

The bind packet gets sent out on only one (randomly chosen at startup) channel, not two. Only the 0x0A write has the TX_EN bit set.

The first four bytes after the length byte (0x18) are different on every TX startup, so they must contain what we are after.

Here is the bind packet structure as I understand it:
18: length

a9: These 4 bytes are different on every startup
dd:
7d:
09:
                
3c: These 4 bytes are always the same (also on my own TX)
14:
01:
fd:

09: This is always equal to the last byte of the "random" 4 bytes

00: 8 bytes zeros, these are always there.
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:

The first four bytes of the data packets are also different on each startup, and except for the fourth byte, differ from those in the bind packet:
18: length

49:
02:
02:
09: This is always the same as the last of the random bytes in the bind packet

0x: 00-03, sequence no.

Payload

The channels used with these packets are 0x13, 0x17, 0x26, and 0x3c.

So there must be a way to get from the 4 "random" bytes in the bind packet to the 4 channels that are used for the hopping sequence. I made a few more captures, to see if there is a pattern, but other than the findings already reported, I couldn't find anything so far, but still, here are the pairings:
a9 dd 7d 09: bind (ch 0a)
13 17 26 3c: channels

7a bc ff 37: bind (ch 08)
11 15 30 3D: channels

78 be df 57: bind (ch 06)
0f 17 2e 3f: channels

c1 75 aa 8c: bind (ch 13)
0d 19 26 38: channels

2d 09 3e f8: bind (ch 06)
10 16 24 3b: channels

65 d1 2c 0a: bind (ch 11)
0b 1b 30 3d: channels

a8 8e ed 49: bind (ch 09)
12 23 2d 40: channels

One more thing might be important, and that's the channel the bind packet gets sent on.

All this assumes that the channel hopping sequence is not negotiated and the TX is calling all the shots.

If it actually is negotiated, we'd have to look at the answer in the FIFO after the last bind packet, but I'm still far from figuring that one out. Again, the first four bytes after the length byte are similar (often the same or only one off) to the ones in the bind packet, but the rest of the packet makes absolutely no sense at all to me.

I've attached a few files to compare, with (hopefully) all the relevant data.
Attachments:
Last edit: 06 Nov 2014 20:10 by alibenpeng.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Nov 2014 10:18 - 07 Nov 2014 10:18 #26309 by btoschi
Replied by btoschi on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Great findings, looking reasonable and fine.
Regarding the 0a/8a bind channel, I've most propably overlooked that only with 0a the actual transmission bit is set - did not spent too much time on these protocols and I've learned most LT8910 features during investigation, as such my first findings are most propably wrong on many things (be warned :P)

I'll check if I can check this evening ... My last evening-task (repairing a dead Phantom 2 Vision) finished successfully.
Side note on the Phantom: How can one build such over-computerized thing and not giving any opportunity to read error codes via PC / App ??? (Did I mention no GPS details, ... ???) Most things are accessible via WiFi protocol - see www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2212861 .
Last edit: 07 Nov 2014 10:18 by btoschi.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jan 2015 09:08 #27647 by alibenpeng
Replied by alibenpeng on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Quick update:

I've got my downconverter delivered, only to find out I've ordered the wrong one. I got one for 2.2-2.4GHz, while what I needed was one for 2.4-2.6GHz. Which is what I now ordered.

I'll be back in another few weeks, then, I guess.. ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jan 2015 22:32 #27728 by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Why 2.4-2.6GHz when the guys article specifically mentions 2.2-2.4GHz?

And do you have a link to it - I failed to find it on aliexpress.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  1. Forum
  3. Development
  5. Protocol Development
  7. Eachine H1 a.k.a. Mini Ninja
Time to create page: 0.115 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
Re-enable mobile display