- Posts: 610
WLH-08 & JJRC H13C protocol
- Durete
- Offline
Less
More
18 Aug 2015 23:16 #37022
by Durete
Replied by Durete on topic WLH-08 & JJRC H13C protocol
Thanks Hexfet
Just returned home from holidays and didn't have too much time to test yet
I reversed the driven trim for packet 4 as you suggested, and now the erratic behaviour is to the right side
Anyone can confirm this behaviour with latest code?
Anyway, I will capture my SPI traces ASAP.
Just returned home from holidays and didn't have too much time to test yet
I reversed the driven trim for packet 4 as you suggested, and now the erratic behaviour is to the right side
Anyone can confirm this behaviour with latest code?
Anyway, I will capture my SPI traces ASAP.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1891
19 Aug 2015 12:01 #37028
by hexfet
Replied by hexfet on topic WLH-08 & JJRC H13C protocol
Sounds like the rudder is not as receptive to the driven trim Try reducing the scale (and may need to re-reverse the direction). Something likeor divide down more if necessary. If it gets so small it doesn't make a difference I'll just take it out.
packet[4] = (0x7f - CHAN2TRIM(packet[1])) >> 1;
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dc59
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 799
19 Aug 2015 12:40 #37029
by dc59
Replied by dc59 on topic WLH-08 & JJRC H13C protocol
I got same result as Durete with lastest combo build on my x600.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Durete
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 610
19 Aug 2015 13:09 #37032
by Durete
Yep, I agree. The rudder channel is not receptive to driven trim.
Just returned home from my maiden flight using a custom build with only driven trim at pitch and roll channels. A blast! The rates are great now, and IMO since I think this is an outdoor quadcopter, I didn't miss to much an increase at rudder channel. Of course should be better a little bit, but not to much.
I will try to build reducing a little bit the scale hoping to find a good value.
(Maiden flight uploading to YouTube )
Replied by Durete on topic WLH-08 & JJRC H13C protocol
hexfet wrote: Sounds like the rudder is not as receptive to the driven trim Try reducing the scale (and may need to re-reverse the direction). Something like
or divide down more if necessary. If it gets so small it doesn't make a difference I'll just take it out.packet[4] = (0x7f - CHAN2TRIM(packet[1])) >> 1;
Yep, I agree. The rudder channel is not receptive to driven trim.
Just returned home from my maiden flight using a custom build with only driven trim at pitch and roll channels. A blast! The rates are great now, and IMO since I think this is an outdoor quadcopter, I didn't miss to much an increase at rudder channel. Of course should be better a little bit, but not to much.
I will try to build reducing a little bit the scale hoping to find a good value.
(Maiden flight uploading to YouTube )
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.036 seconds
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Protocol Development
- WLH-08 & JJRC H13C protocol