- Posts: 698
Spektrum DSM telemetry-inverted field out of range
- Thomas.Heiss
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
21 Sep 2016 11:37 - 21 Sep 2016 11:54 #54090
by Thomas.Heiss
Spektrum DSM telemetry-inverted field out of range was created by Thomas.Heiss
Spektrum DSM telemetry monitor: out of range / inverted black fields on Devo10 A/B/L/R/F/H vs Bat/RxV
Hello,
wanted to check with you developers about the DSM telemetry monitor behavior in "out of range" (telemetry only) scenarios where e.g the TM1000 does not send back for a short time.
When are you exactly blending over to black fields on Devo10, which means inverted?
- devo10-v4.0.1-fcd0669 (including all DSM Indigos Pull Requests merged into V4.0.1 nightly default)
- devo10-v4.0.1-4b3dc91 (Vlad'vy DSM protocol changes commit to default)
- release 5.0.0 (no DSM protocol changes since 4b3dc91)
- Indigos DSMx protocol / telemetry updates test build v4.0.1-103607a
As it seems not all monitor fields on display are inverted at the same time / always?
There seem to be a view fields like Temp/RPM and Bat, RxV which are inverted individually and are de-coupled from FlightLog fields?
FlightLog fields A/B/L/R and F/H seem to be inverted (black) on Devo10 at the same time.
Whereas I do not hold my hand in fire if maybe the two F/H fields could be inverted or switched back to normal even A/B/L/R are still black/inverted
When flying Blade 4503D/ASW17 + doing ground range tests on devo10-v4.0.1-fcd0669 nightly-build I noticed that I get occasionally some short peeps / telemetry alarms.
Hard to detect in flight. I better should use different alarm sounds.
On the ASW17 F>40 alarm was activated.
On the Blade I am not sure anymore if F>40 was activated in 2015 (probably).
For the moment the Blade heli current telemetry config is only alarm 4 Bat <=10.5V, alarm 5 RxV <=4.30V. So I would have to re-test.
Q: Is there any scenario which you know of which "Bat alarm <=10.5V" alone would maybe trigger a short beep / alarm either in any V4.0.1 nightly build or release 5.0.0?
Q: Have you done any tests for a FrameLosses >40 warning which could trigger a short beep / alarm either for 1-3 alarms or 4-6 alarms?
As you know from time to time (telemetry out of range) there are those jumping numbers / bogus telemetry data in older nightly-builds fcd0669 (have not re-tested with latest 5.0.0, nightly-build V4.0.1-4b3dc91, Indigos latest DSM test-build from 2015).
This also applies to FrameLosses field.
So maybe F>40 alarm could be triggered, even for a short time??
My latest ground test for fcd0669 nightly-build at least shows that even for a "out of range" that the Bat value stays the same and only the field is inverted / black. So no BAT number jumping like FlightLog values.
So theoretically a telemetry alarm <=10.5V should never to happen?! This would only apply if there is some bogus telemetry data like with FlightLog fields (but not for higher V value, only for smaller one).
I have to re-test for release 5.0.0/4b3dc91 and Indigos DSM test-build 103607a with and without F>40 alarm to check for any bogus telemetry data filtering improvements.....
Crash-proof 3mm CF Quad with electronics is still not ready
EPO glider ASW17 better should not crash because of any DSM code changes in nightly build 4b3dc91 / release 5.0.0 like the (maybe / unverified / not re-produced) deadlock scenario described here: www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...d-dev-5-0-0-tx-crash
DSMx + telemetry (TM1000) worked quite fine on devo10-v4.0.1-fcd0669 so far for me (without latest DSM code changes) but with above bogus (non-filtered) telemetry out-of-range FlightLog data.
Any comments / experiences?
Best regards
Thomas
Hello,
wanted to check with you developers about the DSM telemetry monitor behavior in "out of range" (telemetry only) scenarios where e.g the TM1000 does not send back for a short time.
When are you exactly blending over to black fields on Devo10, which means inverted?
- devo10-v4.0.1-fcd0669 (including all DSM Indigos Pull Requests merged into V4.0.1 nightly default)
- devo10-v4.0.1-4b3dc91 (Vlad'vy DSM protocol changes commit to default)
- release 5.0.0 (no DSM protocol changes since 4b3dc91)
- Indigos DSMx protocol / telemetry updates test build v4.0.1-103607a
As it seems not all monitor fields on display are inverted at the same time / always?
There seem to be a view fields like Temp/RPM and Bat, RxV which are inverted individually and are de-coupled from FlightLog fields?
FlightLog fields A/B/L/R and F/H seem to be inverted (black) on Devo10 at the same time.
Whereas I do not hold my hand in fire if maybe the two F/H fields could be inverted or switched back to normal even A/B/L/R are still black/inverted
When flying Blade 4503D/ASW17 + doing ground range tests on devo10-v4.0.1-fcd0669 nightly-build I noticed that I get occasionally some short peeps / telemetry alarms.
Hard to detect in flight. I better should use different alarm sounds.
On the ASW17 F>40 alarm was activated.
On the Blade I am not sure anymore if F>40 was activated in 2015 (probably).
For the moment the Blade heli current telemetry config is only alarm 4 Bat <=10.5V, alarm 5 RxV <=4.30V. So I would have to re-test.
Q: Is there any scenario which you know of which "Bat alarm <=10.5V" alone would maybe trigger a short beep / alarm either in any V4.0.1 nightly build or release 5.0.0?
Q: Have you done any tests for a FrameLosses >40 warning which could trigger a short beep / alarm either for 1-3 alarms or 4-6 alarms?
As you know from time to time (telemetry out of range) there are those jumping numbers / bogus telemetry data in older nightly-builds fcd0669 (have not re-tested with latest 5.0.0, nightly-build V4.0.1-4b3dc91, Indigos latest DSM test-build from 2015).
This also applies to FrameLosses field.
So maybe F>40 alarm could be triggered, even for a short time??
My latest ground test for fcd0669 nightly-build at least shows that even for a "out of range" that the Bat value stays the same and only the field is inverted / black. So no BAT number jumping like FlightLog values.
So theoretically a telemetry alarm <=10.5V should never to happen?! This would only apply if there is some bogus telemetry data like with FlightLog fields (but not for higher V value, only for smaller one).
I have to re-test for release 5.0.0/4b3dc91 and Indigos DSM test-build 103607a with and without F>40 alarm to check for any bogus telemetry data filtering improvements.....
Crash-proof 3mm CF Quad with electronics is still not ready
EPO glider ASW17 better should not crash because of any DSM code changes in nightly build 4b3dc91 / release 5.0.0 like the (maybe / unverified / not re-produced) deadlock scenario described here: www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...d-dev-5-0-0-tx-crash
DSMx + telemetry (TM1000) worked quite fine on devo10-v4.0.1-fcd0669 so far for me (without latest DSM code changes) but with above bogus (non-filtered) telemetry out-of-range FlightLog data.
Any comments / experiences?
Best regards
Thomas
Last edit: 21 Sep 2016 11:54 by Thomas.Heiss.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.030 seconds
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Protocol Development
- Spektrum DSM telemetry-inverted field out of range