- Posts: 37
protocol for WL Heli V911-s
- mtx63
- Topic Author
- Offline
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- planger
- Offline
From what I can see it should use flysky...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mtx63
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 37
There is no mode 1 transmitter. For this reason I want to fly with the Devo transmitter.
www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?3101508-Wl-v911s
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- aMax
- Offline
- Posts: 776
It will be more easy to have AIL & ELV on one stick.
After four decades on mode1 I switched for this reason nearly five years ago to mode 2 and since last year I even fly my planes on this mode.
Devo7e, TaranisQ X7, R9M , 4in1 MM, Futaba FC18plusV3.2 & DFT/FLD-02
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- planger
- Offline
If you are willing to send me the TX and heli I can try an over the air attack.
Pascal
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...ne-or-gw008?start=20
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mtx63
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 37
geobish ..gwoo8.. no function.
Dieter
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- planger
- Offline
goebish in his precedent post was explaining that he has already used the attack over the air to reverse engineer the protcol gw008 (it was not for you to try), so he has first hand experience. On my side, I've also done some lately but only using a nrf as the receiver.
You are the one to choose if you want and where you want to send it.
Pascal
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mtx63
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 37
I'm going to send him to Geobish.
Please send me the address by PM.
dieter
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mtx63
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 37
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BirdBarber
- Offline
- Hummingbird Assassin
- Posts: 134
planger wrote: I've looked at the mentioned RC groups link and 1 guy states that he has tried all the protocols without luck. They are using an all in one pan163cx RF chip so no spi dump.
If you are willing to send me the TX and heli I can try an over the air attack.
Pascal
I think that's me. I tried all protocols and most sub options and parameters except for enabling telemetry.
Here are the testing details: www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.php?p=40174852&postcount=135
I live in the northwest US and have a TX and heli available for snooping by any established Deviation developer in the US. I will be out of town off and on for the next few weeks, so it may take me a couple of days to respond.
Attached is a photo of the V911S TX main board. There are no components on the back side.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- planger
- Offline
- Since it's a PAN chip and PAN is manufacturing the XN297, I first looked if the packets have the XN297 SYNC/MAC which is not the case
- I then tried sniffing with the NRF24L01 all frequencies/all rates with sync 0x55/0xAA but I couldn't correlate anything from the noise...
- I'm now trying to look at the packets from a SDR device.
- This is my first time in this area so I need to learn.
- The bind time is really small so I've looked for packets only for normal mode. I've settled on one frequency 2426GHz to study the packet within the hopping.
- You can see where I am with the attached picture.
- I'll go back to the NRF and focus on this specific frequency now that I have one to focus on.
- Try to decode the packets within the SDR.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
Can you share a raw SDR dump ?
(please give the parameters of the capture)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SeByDocKy
- Offline
- Posts: 1016
Hope guru's here will unbrick this one fast
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...gw008?start=40#59368
It should work for both xn297 & xn297l as they don't exactly have the same preamble (0xC710F55 vs 0x710F55).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- captjack01
- Offline
- Posts: 17
Anyone make any headway on this one , or is it looking grim?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- planger
- Offline
Pascal
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- planger
- Offline
It looks like it's a xn297l. At least the signature looks like it from decoding the first bytes of the payload (71 0F 55) through SDR.
I haven't looked at all at the payload content yet (ran out of time), just an outside view for now.
It's running @250Kbps and send something like 24 bytes including CRC after the sync word (to be verified).
The bind info seems to be sent on RF channel 35 at a really high rate 2.5ms first then 5ms, why not...
The freq hopping pattern changes at each power up. It uses 8 channels spaced by 5 except the first one which is 4 (strange...). It's hopping based on a table top->bottom, bottom->top, top ->bottom even then odd,...
Pascal
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
You didn't tell which SDR device and software you're using, sorry, I'm curious.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Protocol Development
- protocol for WL Heli V911-s