XK A110 3 channel plane

XK is more or less high end WLToys.

I have both K110 and A110, different protocols.

A110 is probably same as A100. I only have A110.

And another plane in the same line XK A130 : www.tomtop.com/p-rm11156.html

I think looking at the receiver PCB board that this is a confirmation that most likely XK A100, A110, A120 (that I have not seen so far) and A130 are all using the same protocol.
There is a bunch of connectors on the PCB, I would be interrested to know what's connected and get better pictures of the board if anyone as access to it. I'm just curious for some DIY planes.

Pascal

Interesting. I've not cut open my A110 yet.

When there is a checkbox for each, it may imply each model may have a different customization.

For the sockets, I would say try plugging in a motor to the 2 pinned ones. I guess the wider socket is for brainless servo (motor + variable resistor).

BTW, if you figure out how to calibrate/turn off the gyro, please let us know.

Thanks.

wasp09 wrote: For the sockets, I would say try plugging in a motor to the 2 pinned ones. I guess the wider socket is for brainless servo (motor + variable resistor).

BTW, if you figure out how to calibrate/turn off the gyro, please let us know.

On the gd00x model that I've also hacked there are 2 additional plugs for LEDs that are controlled from the TX. Looking at the PCB, I have the impression that it is the same with a mosfet nearby the 2 plugs at the bottom. The left button that does nothing on the original TX might be to turn them on/off.

The v911s has 2 bytes for flags with only 2 used out of 16 (high rate and calib). You can ask goebish to make a special build so you can test them all and find out if there are special modes. On the v911s some where used but none to disable the gyro. But It's worse trying on this model.

Pascal

I don't really care about adding LED's.

I can alter and build the protocol myself to try out the other bits saying giving them a channel each. However I won't be able to get to the sockets to tell any changes unless the bits affect the behaviour of the existing motors and servo on the A110, e.g. turning the 6 axis off.

Can we get to the RX without cutting my A110 into pieces?

I was not talking about the LEDs in particular. You can test the flags and see if you can change the behavior of the plane.
Pascal

here are some pictures of the chipset and both sides for you. I am still trying to bind to it with the t8sg v2 but am having issues doing so. I 'm new at this but hoping to learn more.

Is there anything new on that topic? I recently bought a A120-A380 and the V911S does not bind with my 7e 256. Btw I have 2 additional modules the nrf2401 and the a7105.

Regards Timo

an observation on the this topic as well as on the v911s protocol thread.

I am lucky enough to have my old 4in1 module working in a 7e to bind and fly A100, A130 etc for several months. Range is beyond sight.

As my 7e (actually two of them, one for planes and one for boats) has been working for me since the day of Deviation, it is old enough for me to renew and take a path to a Jumper T8SG carbon version. Yes I already aware, no successful binding to v911s so far. But according to the discussion here, the problem is something to do with the NF chipset and it so happened that the ones I used is the older 4in1 module just able to work.

My idea is to get a new Jumper and swapping out (I have two actually) the 4in1 with that on my trusty 7e. To my surprise, it doesn't work. V911s not able to bind

So may be we could rule out the RF chip issue and see if there is other things we may missed out.


cmPang