- Posts: 110
Flysky Mod How-to
- rototophe
- Topic Author
- Offline
I see the firmware supports the Flysky protocol. Hints were given that the support would require salvaging the Tx module of a V911 Tx and wire/solder it inside the Devo 8.
A set of instructions on how to perform the procedure, possibly along with some pictures, would be great. I am sure it's in the works anyways, I guess I am just impatient to bind my V911 and V929 to my Devo 8 and fly them with a decent radio.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
deviationtx.com/downloads/Flysky%20to%20Devo%20-%20Draft.pdf
(It is also on the Downloads page)
Edit:
Fixed the link
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rototophe
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 110
Thanks for the document. I just read through it once so far. It looks clear enough at first glance.
Couple remarks:
- Few typos here and there in the document, no big deal as far as understanding what needs to be done.
- When reading through the first time and getting to the pin matching table I was confused about what the TMS pin was and about it's location. That issue is cleared when continuing the reading. Maybe the TMS could be introduced before this table. In the very same way the transmitting modules are introduced.
- Is the antenna wire on the A7105 of any use in this mod? If yes does it need to be connected to the radio antenna? Arranged in a certain way inside the case? If not can it be cut off or de-soldered. (I am just asking all the dumb questions that come to mind here). I guess the question here is: witch module actually sends out the RF output for the Flysky protocol?
- Maybe it would be a good idea, at what is now the end of the document, to instruct the reader to insulate the A7105 with hot glue or shrink tubing before sticking it inside the Devo 8 case. A suggestion about where to locate it inside the case could also be provided.
That's about it regarding the document itself.
Now I have a more general question about the mod itself.
Let's say I solder the A7105 in my radio and for some strange reason I want to go back to the stock firmware. Will the presence of the foreign module in there disrupt proper operation of the Walkera firmware?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vlad_vy
- Offline
- Posts: 3333
files.mail.ru/4DIF39
Open page, wait 10 seconds, then press red button.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
I'll incorporate the feedback but...rototophe wrote: Now that was fast
Thanks for the document. I just read through it once so far. It looks clear enough at first glance.
Yes the antenna from the V911 is still in use. I would point it either up or down, but honestly it doesn't need to be outside the Tx.Is the antenna wire on the A7105 of any use in this mod? If yes does it need to be connected to the radio antenna? Arranged in a certain way inside the case? If not can it be cut off or de-soldered. (I am just asking all the dumb questions that come to mind here). I guess the question here is: witch module actually sends out the RF output for the Flysky protocol?
Thanks for reminding me. I meant to put that in, but forgot.Maybe it would be a good idea, at what is now the end of the document, to instruct the reader to insulate the A7105 with hot glue or shrink tubing before sticking it inside the Devo 8 case. A suggestion about where to locate it inside the case could also be provided.
It won't cause any issues at all (except for potentially drawing a little more power) with the stock firmware.Now I have a more general question about the mod itself.
Let's say I solder the A7105 in my radio and for some strange reason I want to go back to the stock firmware. Will the presence of the foreign module in there disrupt proper operation of the Walkera firmware?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rototophe
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 110
PhracturedBlue wrote: Yes the antenna from the V911 is still in use. I would point it either up or down, but honestly it doesn't need to be outside the Tx.
What range can be expected with this setup and using a Flysky Rx? Can I safely assume it's OK to use a modified Devo8 and a Flysy Rx in a large scale plane (2 meters+ wingspan/50cc engine) and fly the thing without having cold sweat running down my spine when the plane becomes small to the eye? Or is it best to stick with indoor/outdoor flying of micro planes/helis/quads?
Not undermining anything here, just trying to gauge the hardware potential. I'm already super happy that I'll be able to fly V911s and 939 with something else than the stock Rx ... I was contemplating buying a 9x radio then I came across a thread on Rc groups talking about some sort of project for some sort of firmware for a Walkera radio ...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
I definitely would not fly a large-scale plane with this setup using the Flysky protocol. The range will likely be significantly less than that of a Turnigy 9x. I don't know what power-amp the flysky module uses, but it is designed for a micro-heli, so probably not that powerful. I've bought 100mW 2.4GHz transceivers from AliExpress for the CC2500 and nrf24l01 modules (which are used by other 2.4Ghz RC systems). But I haven't found one based on the A7105 yet.rototophe wrote:
PhracturedBlue wrote: Yes the antenna from the V911 is still in use. I would point it either up or down, but honestly it doesn't need to be outside the Tx.
What range can be expected with this setup and using a Flysky Rx. Can I safely assume it's OK to use a modified Devo8 and a Flysy Rx in a large scale plane (2 meters+ wingspan/50cc engine) and fly the thing without having cold sweat running down my spine when the plane becomes small to the eye? Or is it best to stick with indoor/outdoor flying of micro planes/helis/quads?
Not undermining anything here, just trying to gauge the hardware potential. I'm already super happy that I'll be able to fly V911s and 939 with something else than the stock Rx ... I was contemplating buying a 9x radio then I came across a thread on Rc groups talking about some sort of project for some sort of firmware for a Walkera radio ...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
www.aliexpress.com/item/A7105-500m-wirel...odule/618163359.html
That is a 50mW A7105 module. A little pricey though.
I'm not sure how to measure the Tx power of the V911 module, so I'm not sure how it would compare to that. I'll probably order one to see. It should install exactly the same as the V911 module does.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rototophe
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 110
I probably lost 2 notches of eyesight staring at the pins of the Devo RF module while soldering under a magnifying glass. Anyhow, the Tx did boot up and did not smoke after soldering was completed (pweeff) and I was able to bind a V911 using Fixed ID. Couldn't get it to bind at boot for some reason, but I am sure I was not doing it right. Anyhow, it did bind and all controls moving, nice!
One question still on the Flysky support in Deviation: do the transmit power in the model setting page actually work with the V911 RF module? Or?
I also though while spending some time trying to set up the V911 that it would be nice if Deviation could handle power saving on the LCD. Backligh level and turn screen off to save power and avoid marking the screen if you stay too long (always) on the same page ... but I am sure it's in the works for the next release
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
Anyhow.
use the 4ch w/ DR template.
then set AIL, ELE, and RUD to reversed (in the channel page, not the mixer src)
That should be all it takes to get it flyable.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rototophe
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 110
PhracturedBlue wrote: If you get around to it, feel free to post your setup.
I'll definitely post a V911 template up soon. Actually I thought I'll wait until expodential is fixed so I can post a complete ini file with Dual Rates, Expo and everything. So far I have it set at 60% throw everywhere but rudder (50%), some subtrim on Elevator as the thing is tail heavy because of battery placement and some subtrim on Ailerons because it's drifting sideways.
One thing I noticed while setting up the model is that subtrim travel is limited to a value of 10 and it's definitely not enough and need to be increased. Or am I getting it wrong and subtrim is indexed on the trim step value set for the channel in the Trim page?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
No, you got it right. I can make subtrim larger, but the issue is that you'll run out of throw on the Rx side if it gets too much larger, and you'll see uneven control for pos/neg directions.rototophe wrote:
PhracturedBlue wrote: If you get around to it, feel free to post your setup.
I'll definitely post a V911 template up soon. Actually I thought I'll wait until expodential is fixed so I can post a complete ini file with Dual Rates, Expo and everything. So far I have it set at 60% throw everywhere but rudder (50%), some subtrim on Elevator as the thing is tail heavy because of battery placement and some subtrim on Ailerons because it's drifting sideways.
One thing I noticed while setting up the model is that subtrim travel is limited to a value of 10 and it's definitely not enough and need to be increased. Or am I getting it wrong and subtrim is indexed on the trim step value set for the channel in the Trim page?
effectively subtrim will overdrive the servos. Most receivers can take ~40% overdrive (140%) but it depends on the protocol.
And the expo bug is now fixed if you didn't see.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rototophe
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 110
PhracturedBlue wrote: No, you got it right. I can make subtrim larger, but the issue is that you'll run out of throw on the Rx side if it gets too much larger, and you'll see uneven control for pos/neg directions.
effectively subtrim will overdrive the servos. Most receivers can take ~40% overdrive (140%) but it depends on the protocol.
And the expo bug is now fixed if you didn't see.
A little more would be nice, actually as much as you feel it safe.
PhracturedBlue wrote: I just looked again and found this:
www.aliexpress.com/item/A7105-500m-wirel...odule/618163359.html
That is a 50mW A7105 module. A little pricey though.
I'm not sure how to measure the Tx power of the V911 module, so I'm not sure how it would compare to that. I'll probably order one to see. It should install exactly the same as the V911 module does.
Let me know if you order the module and run some tests on it, I'd be interested in having a more powerful Flysky setup in the radio.
On the same topic, would it be a dumb idea to assume the actual 9x flysky module could be used? May be actually less powerful than the module you were talking about...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
No it isn't usable. It takes a PPM input which is not the same as the SPI input that we use for the V911 modulerototophe wrote: On the same topic, would it be a dumb idea to assume the actual 9x flysky module could be used? May be actually less powerful than the module you were talking about...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gektor
- Offline
- Posts: 8
Do I understand correctly, that this Mod adds the second Transmitter, which is always active but will not affect the other protocols like Walkera, Devo and DSM2?
Will the two transmitters working at the same time so closely together cause no interference at all?
I would like to use my V911 Heli ocasionally, while operating Walkera and Devo Helicopters on a reagular basis. I use Deviation and the standard Walkera Firmware and alternate between both sometimes.
Is it a good Idea to make this mod then?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rototophe
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 110
I also tested the original Walkera firmware operation with the mod and all appear to work as intended.
Don't forget to insulate the V911 module with hot glue or shrink tubing before sticking it inside the Devo. I located it on top of the Devo RF module with servo double side tape, antenna pointing down.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gektor
- Offline
- Posts: 8
PhracturedBlue wrote: Only one module is actually transmitting at a time so there should not be any significant interference, however, I have yet to do a range-test to confirm.
This is interesting: how do you (technically seen) switch between two modules which are soldered to one Transmitter? Is this funcitonality implemented within the Deviation Firmware? What about the standard Firmware which I also use? How does this firmware know, which module is activated?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- News, Announcements and Feedback
- Feedback & Questions
- Flysky Mod How-to