×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.

HiSky HT-8 module reviews

More
09 Jan 2014 14:10 #18278 by MakDaddy
HiSky HT-8 module reviews was created by MakDaddy
How many of you use the Hisky HT-8 ppm module and does it work as expected or is it better to install a nrf24l01 module in the TX?
  • rbe2012
  • rbe2012's Avatar
  • Offline
  • So much to do, so little time...
More
09 Jan 2014 16:20 #18286 by rbe2012
Replied by rbe2012 on topic HiSky HT-8 module reviews
I don't use any of them but you are limited to the implemented protocol when you use a PPM-to-something module. So if you want to fly more nrf-based models than Hisky you run better with an internal module (fully controlled by deviation).
More
10 Jan 2014 08:39 - 10 Jan 2014 08:39 #18318 by stevecox
Replied by stevecox on topic HiSky HT-8 module reviews
I have used a HT-8 successfully with a FBL100. The HT-8 without the internal battery - the first ones. It worked fine, but for myself I felt it was a fag. I haven't yet but will do the internal mod instead.

Adelaide
Last edit: 10 Jan 2014 08:39 by stevecox.
More
11 Jan 2014 21:15 #18379 by MakDaddy
Replied by MakDaddy on topic HiSky HT-8 module reviews
Thanks for the replies, looks like a module upgrade. Any one better than another?
More
19 Oct 2016 22:18 #55174 by TEAM BMAN
Replied by TEAM BMAN on topic HiSky HT-8 module reviews
Any one else have any experience with these? I just picked 1 up stupid cheap and ordered a devo7e. Im wondering if I could use it in a dx6 park flyer and if not in the 7e? or coud I now get a 9xr pro and fit this in with suitable RX?

Im interested in range and reliability. Can only find buts of info.

While im here I got the 7e and noticed the hisky h6 just a lil cheaper. Te me there not same model except the 7e got less buttons?

That might just be the next decent budget tx or the i6 range. I gt the 7e purely on recomendations of deviation so want to stay around here. Wanted a f7 tbh but not covered :(
Time to create page: 0.120 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum