- Posts: 20
Please do a combined build of testing protocols
- T.N.
- Topic Author
- Offline
I'm still struggle building my own platform
Many thanks!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
For the other protocols, drop a message in the corresponding threads if you've tested them successfully, this may speed up the pull requests
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mwm
- Offline
The devo7E build exceeded the size of the Devo7E. They are done with the 2014 q4 version of the ARM build chain. I haven't yet updated to that from the q3 version, which still builds the 7e version. I did try the version using gcc 5.0 instead of gcc 4.8, and that was to big for the 7E quite a while ago. PB is aware of the issue. In his shoes, I'd just reinstall the q3 compiler so we got nightly builds while this got sorted out. But I suspect the 7E is about to lose yet more features.
Do not ask me questions via PM. Ask in the forums, where I'll answer if I can.
My remotely piloted vehicle ("drone") is a yacht.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- T.N.
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 20
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
I merged my MT99xx branch with latest default, then if I name my new protocol "MT99" in protocol.h, I can build for 7e, but if I add only 1 character to this name then it doesn't build anymore because it doesn't fit in ROM !
... and my build doesn't have the Bayang protocol
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mwm
- Offline
Do not ask me questions via PM. Ask in the forums, where I'll answer if I can.
My remotely piloted vehicle ("drone") is a yacht.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
bitbucket.org/goebish/deviationtx/branch/EAchine_H7
I'll also take care of updating the manual.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Richard96816
- Offline
- Posts: 208
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mwm
- Offline
You might as well create the pull request before testing. If you have to updated it, bitbucket will see the changes once you push them, and update the pull request to match.
Unfortunately, deleting icons won't help. The file system and executable code are in different memory segments.
Do not ask me questions via PM. Ask in the forums, where I'll answer if I can.
My remotely piloted vehicle ("drone") is a yacht.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Away
- Posts: 1894
The devo7e build fails with 4_8-2014q3 (32 bytes too big), 4_8-2013q4 (68 bytes), and 4.9.3.2015q2 (232 bytes).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mwm
- Offline
Do not ask me questions via PM. Ask in the forums, where I'll answer if I can.
My remotely piloted vehicle ("drone") is a yacht.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
Note this is not a thread to discuss the merits of my decision to remove ini handling, and I'll probably delete any complaints I see about it here (go start a new thread if you have something constructive to say). I am just giving an update on what can be done about additional protocols short term (not very much).
Alternatively, if we want to wait a bit more for 4.1, it is likely possible to deal with protocols like we do icons, and not hard-code the list into Deviation. Then adding protocols will not change Deviation's size. The downside is that the module code is really hairy, and such an invasive change would likely take a while to debug and get working reliably.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Away
- Posts: 1894
I've uploaded test builds with those three protocols for the 7e and 10. Remember only one deviation user on MJXq at a time.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SeByDocKy
- Offline
- Posts: 1016
hexfet wrote: Great, thanks. The 7e builds even with 4.9.3 compiler and Bayang, FY326, and MJXq protocols.
I've uploaded test builds with those three protocols for the 7e and 10. Remember only one deviation user on MJXq at a time.
Where is it ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Away
- Posts: 1894
Test BuildsSeByDocKy wrote: Where is it ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- General
- General Discussions
- Please do a combined build of testing protocols