- Posts: 31
Problem: Low range after WK-DEVO-S Upgrade of 7e
- eirikso
- Topic Author
- Offline
www.hacksmods.com/2014/10/wk-devo-s-mod-module-for-devo7e
After the mod my radio works fine. It binds perfectly to my quad and controls it like it should. But my range is worse than with the original module.
When I measure the output I get around 0.3 mW. It should have been 100 or 150. I am running the latest stable build of Deviation and have edited hardware.ini with has_pa-cyrf6936 = 1.
When I removed the old module I had trouble with some of the pads, but managed to solder directly to the small dot leading through the PCB.
And because the radio finds the module and everything works like it should with binding and controlling all the channels my idea is that the soldering is OK. If one of the connections is bad I would guess that the radio would not work at all?
So my question is:
1. Can bad soldering of one of the connections cause OK binding etc but bad range? If so, which of the connections could lead to poor range if the connection is bad?
2. If the fact that the module binds and works means that the connections is OK. What can I do to improve the range?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HappyHarry
- Offline
- Posts: 1136
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eirikso
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 31
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eirikso
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 31
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HappyHarry
- Offline
- Posts: 1136
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Cereal_Killer
- Offline
Taranis X9E | DEVO 10 | Devo U7E | Taranis Q7
What I do in real life: rivergoequestrian.com/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eirikso
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 31
Thank you very much for all the information. This really helps when I now keep on debugging.
I have measured actual voltage and it is 5.5 Volts. I have not powered it without an antenna connected.
I went over and measured connection on all the cables and checked again for possible problems.
I also disconnected the antenna and checked the connectors. And I think I found the problem. When I measure connection in the center of the U.fl connector up to the antenna it seems like there is a bad connection.
Unfortunately I don't have a spare right now, but I testet by connecting an antenna that has an U.fl connector. I can not measure the direct power with that solution, but I can connect an antenna to my Immersion RC power meter and check if the signal reach the power meter.
And I now measure a huge difference.
So my conclusion so far is: there was a problem with the cable between the Ufl-connector and the SMA-connector. Meaning that the module probably have been powered up several times without a proper connection to the antenna. This could have damaged the module. But my tests so far with the antenna that I have here now, directly connected to the U.fl seems promising.
I'll do some more tests and check back here when I get hold of a new Ufl->SMA adapter so that I can measure the actual output power.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HappyHarry
- Offline
- Posts: 1136
i'd be glad if you post back once your new u.fl>sma arrives and you test the modules output again, and if I could ask a favour for the community in that could you test each rf chip at tx power settings of lets say 30mw,100mw and 150mw and post the results from the inversion meter it would be much appreciated
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eirikso
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 31
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eirikso
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 31
Sel. output . | Measured output |
100µW | 0.06 mW |
300µW | 0.29 mW |
1 mW | 1.1 mW |
3 mW | 4.11 mW |
10 mW | 10.66 mW |
30 mW | 30.63 mW |
100 mW | 80 mW |
150 mW | 112 mW |
I don't know if the lower output on the 100 and 150 mW settings are due to the fact that my module could have been damaged when used against the faulty U.fl-connector.
The measurement was done with the Devo set to DSM-output.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eirikso
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 31
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HappyHarry
- Offline
- Posts: 1136
again many thanks for taking the time to test and post the results
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- aMax
- Offline
- Posts: 776
Download the RDAT212 documentation and you will see, you got more output at the sma connector as you should have expected normally.eirikso wrote: I have now fixed the Devo with a new U.fl connector and a new SMA. So I could measure the actual output with my Immersion RF Power Meter. These are the results from my WK_DEVO_S-module:
Sel. output . Measured output 100µW 0.06 mW 300µW 0.29 mW 1 mW 1.1 mW 3 mW 4.11 mW 10 mW 10.66 mW 30 mW 30.63 mW 100 mW 80 mW 150 mW 112 mW
I don't know if the lower output on the 100 and 150 mW settings are due to the fact that my module could have been damaged when used against the faulty U.fl-connector.
The measurement was done with the Devo set to DSM-output.
Devo7e, TaranisQ X7, R9M , 4in1 MM, Futaba FC18plusV3.2 & DFT/FLD-02
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ajtank
- Offline
- Posts: 278
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eirikso
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 31
1 mW = 0.91 mW
3 mW = 3.4 mW
10 mW = 9.06 mW
30 mW = 37.5 mW
100 mW = 90 mW
150 mW = 112 mW
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- General
- General Discussions
- Problem: Low range after WK-DEVO-S Upgrade of 7e