iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol

More
31 Jan 2018 04:00 - 31 Jan 2018 04:42 #67296 by vlad_vy
Replied by vlad_vy on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol

betoinbeta wrote: Transmitter powering up problem

If I turn off the transmitter I can’t turn it back on.

I tried unplugging the AA battery module and it often times still doesn’t power up.

At first I thought I had a bad batch of batteries but it still does it even with a fresh batch.

Sometimes waiting for more than few minutes does power it back up.

Does anyone else have this issue and possible fix?


It can be fixed by changing capacitor 220uF to 22uF, will be better to use 16-25V capacitors. You have to use 2 soldering irons to remove SMD capacitor.

www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.php?p=39085000&postcount=474



Attachments:
Last edit: 31 Jan 2018 04:42 by vlad_vy.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
31 Jan 2018 04:08 #67299 by Hayataro
Replied by Hayataro on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
Use 22uF/16V or 22uF/25V capacitor for upper cap.
And use 220uF (or less 100uF should be okay) 25V capacitor for lower cap.
Note that lower smt electrode is MINUS-Polarity.

using same ID in RCGroups.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
31 Jan 2018 19:40 #67318 by nille
Replied by nille on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol

Moeder wrote: Those bridges are intended, as those are all power supply Pins.


Thanks, you are right.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Feb 2018 00:43 - 01 Feb 2018 00:47 #67326 by Hayataro
Replied by Hayataro on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
Slightly off topic....

CYRF6936 is discontinued.....
www.cypress.com/part/cyrf6936-40ltxc

And Cypress do not have latest 802.15.4 products, only WiFi.

using same ID in RCGroups.
Last edit: 01 Feb 2018 00:47 by Hayataro.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Feb 2018 18:29 - 02 Feb 2018 18:38 #67365 by antennenfreund
Replied by antennenfreund on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
Hello dear friends!

With Frsky receivers there are unfortunately very strong range issues. Me and a friend of mine get a failsave after like 50-100 meters with Frsky!

"FrSky R-XSR Ultra SBUS / CPPM D16 16CH Mini Redundancy Receiver 1.5g for RC Multirotor FPV Racing Drone"

www.banggood.com/FrSky-R-XSR-Ultra-SBUS-...57.html?rmmds=search

Does anyone else have the problem?

On "afdhs 2a" there were no range issues so far with an x6b reciever Unfortunately the receiver is too big for some builds.

This is the one: "Flysky X6B 2.4G 6CH i-BUS PPM PWM Receiver for AFHDS i10 i6s i6 i6x i4x Transmitter"

www.banggood.com/Flysky-X6B-2_4G-6CH-i-B...earch&cur_warehouse= USA

Are there any alternative for small recievers with rssi telemetry?

Is it maybe a BUG is the software of "Deviation"? (FrSky)

There is also a problem with the included reciever, it only works in ppm, not sbus or ibus mode. This adds the issue that you cant set up a failsave properly and the quad stays armed, motors spinning so using that is just dangerous.

www.banggood.com/818CH-Mini-Receiver-Wit...__4&cur_warehouse=CN
Last edit: 02 Feb 2018 18:38 by antennenfreund.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Feb 2018 06:04 - 04 Feb 2018 08:04 #67381 by wdlee
Replied by wdlee on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
The potentiometer of Jimbol was fixed with epoxy resin.
Then the center problem was solved.
Attachments:
Last edit: 04 Feb 2018 08:04 by wdlee.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Feb 2018 12:49 #67402 by wdlee
Replied by wdlee on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
H, G switch Modify photos attached.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Feb 2018 13:03 #67403 by wdlee
Replied by wdlee on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
ir8m has no trainer port. Can I add a trainer port?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Feb 2018 13:11 - 05 Feb 2018 13:12 #67404 by vlad_vy
Replied by vlad_vy on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
I think the trainer port use P11 connector. I don't know pinout. It can be GND, PPM in and PPM out.
Last edit: 05 Feb 2018 13:12 by vlad_vy.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Feb 2018 17:44 #67408 by plmask
Replied by plmask on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
I am also not able to bind an Frsky D8 receiver to this radio. I was able to bind a Frsky XM+, but no luck with several different Frsky D8s. I have not checked the range of the XM+ to see if I have range issues like others on this thread.

Has anyone successfully bound a D8?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Feb 2018 03:39 #67411 by vlad_vy
Replied by vlad_vy on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
Do you try to use "Freq-Fine" protocol option?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Feb 2018 06:06 #67412 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
For my IR8M, all FrSkyX D16 receiver needed a Freqfine set to 63... So I guess it will be requiered also for the D8 protocol

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Feb 2018 16:01 #67421 by plmask
Replied by plmask on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
I have not tried tuning the frequency. I will give it try tonight. Thank you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Feb 2018 16:03 - 06 Feb 2018 16:05 #67422 by plmask
Replied by plmask on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol

SeByDocKy wrote: For my IR8M, all FrSkyX D16 receiver needed a Freqfine set to 63... So I guess it will be requiered also for the D8 protocol


For the fine tuning option, I assume the 63 is shifting the frequency positive by 63 steps? Also, how did you determine 63 was the right number?
Thanks.
Last edit: 06 Feb 2018 16:05 by plmask.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Feb 2018 18:28 #67423 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
Yes +63

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Feb 2018 23:24 #67424 by plmask
Replied by plmask on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol
Adjusting the fine frequency by 63 worked for binding the Frsky D8 receiver. Thank you.
Range check with 100uw worked at 30 feet.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2018 17:25 #67430 by plmask
Replied by plmask on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol

SeByDocKy wrote: Yes +63


First, thank you for this information.

How did you determine +63 was the correct offset? I am interested in the details because I am an electrical engineer and want to understand the approach in case I run across a similar issue with other receivers.

Thank you again.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2018 17:34 #67431 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol

plmask wrote:

SeByDocKy wrote: Yes +63


First, thank you for this information.

How did you determine +63 was the correct offset? I am interested in the details because I am an electrical engineer and want to understand the approach in case I run across a similar issue with other receivers.

Thank you again.



The classic méthod ..... First bind with a correct value .... watch the receiver led.... The led will start to blink slower when the RSSI will decrease..... Note the Lower bound, (+4 for me), the Upper bound (127).... and take the middle interval value

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Feb 2018 17:46 #67432 by antennenfreund
Replied by antennenfreund on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol

plmask wrote: Adjusting the fine frequency by 63 worked for binding the Frsky D8 receiver. Thank you.
Range check with 100uw worked at 30 feet.


30 feet?????

that is very very little. There you will have no problems.

3000 feet must go!

with Frsky and this station is only 200 to 400 feet!
That is far too little :(

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
08 Feb 2018 00:49 #67439 by plmask
Replied by plmask on topic iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multi-Protocol

SeByDocKy wrote:

plmask wrote:

SeByDocKy wrote: Yes +63


First, thank you for this information.

How did you determine +63 was the correct offset? I am interested in the details because I am an electrical engineer and want to understand the approach in case I run across a similar issue with other receivers.

Thank you again.



The classic méthod ..... First bind with a correct value .... watch the receiver led.... The led will start to blink slower when the RSSI will decrease..... Note the Lower bound, (+4 for me), the Upper bound (127).... and take the middle interval value



Thank you again for the reply.

You have great patience to determine the range!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.108 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum