- Posts: 486
Bind two RXs and spread?
- RoGuE_StreaK
- Topic Author
- Offline
Actually that could prove quite interesting, could control two separate devices with the one TX at once...?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vlad_vy
- Offline
- Posts: 3333
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RoGuE_StreaK
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 486
ie.
Ch1 = RX1 Ch1
Ch2 = RX1 Ch2
Ch3 = RX1 Ch3
Ch4 = RX1 Ch4
Ch5 = RX1 Ch5
Ch6 = RX1 Ch6
Ch7 = RX2 Ch1
Ch8 = RX2 Ch2
Ch9 = RX2 Ch3
Ch10 = RX2 Ch4
Ch11 = RX2 Ch5
Ch12 = RX2 Ch6
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vlad_vy
- Offline
- Posts: 3333
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pattaya01
- Offline
- Posts: 181
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RoGuE_StreaK
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 486
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FDR
- Offline
I have to diagree with Vlad: you can of course program such a feature. The DMS protocol sends packages rare enough to be able to to split the time and transmit to an other receiver too.RoGuE_StreaK wrote: Stray thought; could it be theoretically possible to create a deviation that could bind to two DSM2 RXs at once, and spread the channels across the two? ie., have two 6ch RXs essentially act as one 12ch RX? Using two fixed IDs?
However you should rewrite quite a lot of code to achieve that...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RoGuE_StreaK
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 486
'twas more out of curiosity than anything, I don't have the need yet, though I could probably give it a crack if I did need it; would such a thing be handled purely in protocol/dsm2.c? Would require a much better understanding of protocols than I currently have (which is a grand total of zilch )FDR wrote: However you should rewrite quite a lot of code to achieve that...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vlad_vy
- Offline
- Posts: 3333
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RoGuE_StreaK
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 486
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SadSack
- Offline
- Posts: 317
RoGuE_StreaK wrote: PB must have cost himself a hell of a lot of receivers. Lucky deviation's fairly stable and complete, 'cause we ain't gonna be doing any more work on it!
Sure all is not lost. We are seeing how much of a driving force PB was to deviation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FDR
- Offline
RoGuE_StreaK wrote:
'twas more out of curiosity than anything, I don't have the need yet, though I could probably give it a crack if I did need it; would such a thing be handled purely in protocol/dsm2.c? Would require a much better understanding of protocols than I currently have (which is a grand total of zilch )FDR wrote: However you should rewrite quite a lot of code to achieve that...
It's mainly the dsm2.c, but not only that, because you should maintan the storage of the second fixed id as well, and some way to indicate the need of the second transmittion.
Also since there is already a transmittion in each 4ms, which will decrease to 2ms if you send to 2 receivers, you will probably loose the ability to receive telemetry data inbetween the packages...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Hexperience
- Offline
- Posts: 588
There are 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Development
- Bind two RXs and spread?