- Posts: 69
development protocol for TX , and how is RX ?
- john
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
14 Feb 2014 00:24 - 14 Feb 2014 00:29 #20246
by john
development protocol for TX , and how is RX ? was created by john
hello Coder
i had see here some protocol Flysky,skywatec ,Hisky, ..... All them buid for TX because we use RX from multi or helicopter available
however, if i want to buid a RX with arduino to use all channel for each protocol , how do i do ?
i search internet and see only protocol Flysky ( of midelic on rcgroup ) support TX - RX , don't see ptorocol other ?
I like protocol nrf24l01 ( protocol v202 ) and i need build a ardcuino for RX
THANK
i had see here some protocol Flysky,skywatec ,Hisky, ..... All them buid for TX because we use RX from multi or helicopter available
however, if i want to buid a RX with arduino to use all channel for each protocol , how do i do ?
i search internet and see only protocol Flysky ( of midelic on rcgroup ) support TX - RX , don't see ptorocol other ?
I like protocol nrf24l01 ( protocol v202 ) and i need build a ardcuino for RX
THANK
Last edit: 14 Feb 2014 00:29 by john.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- victzh
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1386
14 Feb 2014 06:13 #20254
by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic development protocol for TX , and how is RX ?
Why don't you take Midelic's code which already implements many aspects of RX and replace the protocol for V202? And why would you need this? If you need a cheap RX, you better use some DSM2 compatible - they're better supported on both TX and RX.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- john
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 69
14 Feb 2014 06:31 #20255
by john
hello victch
problem is range . I had test protocol as a7105, cc2500 is range 200m while nrf24l01 + pa + la is 800m
more, nrf24l01 is sell very much .
As you as say use code Midelic's, but i don't know much change code from A7105 for nrf24l01 .
currently , i have arduino for TX ( protocol v202 )
Replied by john on topic development protocol for TX , and how is RX ?
victzh wrote: Why don't you take Midelic's code which already implements many aspects of RX and replace the protocol for V202? And why would you need this? If you need a cheap RX, you better use some DSM2 compatible - they're better supported on both TX and RX.
hello victch
problem is range . I had test protocol as a7105, cc2500 is range 200m while nrf24l01 + pa + la is 800m
more, nrf24l01 is sell very much .
As you as say use code Midelic's, but i don't know much change code from A7105 for nrf24l01 .
currently , i have arduino for TX ( protocol v202 )
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- victzh
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1386
14 Feb 2014 07:09 #20257
by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic development protocol for TX , and how is RX ?
Nobody complains about DSM2 range, and the range is less dependent on the RF chip than on the LNA/PA.
What you are trying to do is non-trivial programming task. I took a brief look at Midelic's code, and while it is not very clean, it's pretty short. But you need to replace almost everything, the only part which is OK as is is the PPM generation code.
What you are trying to do is non-trivial programming task. I took a brief look at Midelic's code, and while it is not very clean, it's pretty short. But you need to replace almost everything, the only part which is OK as is is the PPM generation code.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- blackmoon
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 402
14 Feb 2014 07:09 #20258
by blackmoon
Replied by blackmoon on topic development protocol for TX , and how is RX ?
John check this thread at rcgroups :
www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1484458
It's for a receiver for the SoloPro transmitter from nine eagles, it's only 4 channels, but if you know how you can adapt it for more channels and other protocol.
It's not what you're looking for but it's a start.
It's for a receiver for the SoloPro transmitter from nine eagles, it's only 4 channels, but if you know how you can adapt it for more channels and other protocol.
It's not what you're looking for but it's a start.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.039 seconds
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Protocol Development
- development protocol for TX , and how is RX ?