- Posts: 3
V977 on 7e
- Aenima
- Offline
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ahmadie
- Offline
- Posts: 9
Aenima wrote: Hi guys i need some help. My DEVO10 binding well to my v977 but is have no tail move to the left. Maybe is a module foult or the soldering. I tried 2 brand new tail sets. Any idea? Thanks.
u either have faulty board of heli but not likely.the other problem i can point is that ur rudder of ur transmitter is fault or broken. open transmitter and check all cable are in place. v977 transmitter are broken from time to time. this in not correct place to ask so it is going to be deleted anyhow.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- anthony
- Offline
- Posts: 5
v997 use 8channel , but my tx only 7 chanel, so i can't use mode
3G/6G , any ideal for ideal ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- victzh
- Offline
- Posts: 1386
I will go on working on it, but don't expect me blindly applying the patch in its entirety.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Offline
- Posts: 1868
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- victzh
- Offline
- Posts: 1386
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jimqjp
- Offline
- Posts: 34
victzh wrote: @Babay, @hexfet - I checked the "fix" patch. It's impossible to say what specifically it fixes, it's a total re-write of the protocol code. I don't say it's wrong, but I prefer this patch to be separated into 2 parts - one is a real fix (the nature of which is still unclear from this code and needs analyzing), and "code beautification" part. Another matter is that the patch also adds functionality, so actually it is 3 parts, not clearly separated from each other.
I will go on working on it, but don't expect me blindly applying the patch in its entirety.
Frankly speaking, I do not know either what was the real fix and why when I wrote the module . Because the problem is intermittent, I only knew it worked better after implemented the combination of the following changes :
1. Improve data integrity by adding a temp var in mixer.c. This can eliminate the situation that middle results are used in the TX ISR.
2. Instead of sending new channel data in every data packets, the data are reused in all 4 data packets of a hopping frequency. Assumed that KN can get smoother values.
3. The simplified data sending algorithm (write 10 bytes payload regs only) uses very short CPU time in ISR, assumed that the timing becomes more accurate.
4. Removed some unused RX register settings to ensure RX is off and not affect TX.
The real answer relies on the log at RX side when the servo stops working, that may be an luxury we never can get .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jimqjp
- Offline
- Posts: 34
anthony wrote: hi guys
v997 use 8channel , but my tx only 7 chanel, so i can't use mode
3G/6G , any ideal for ideal ?
For the modified KN protocol, it can work with only 6 channels. The ch 6 is used for the flight mode.
If you only have 7E without switch mod, you can only get two of the three possible modes from the two values of the flight mode switch settings.
-100: 6 axis normal
0: 3 axis normal
100: 3 axis 3D
However, you can setup two 977 models, one for 6 axis and 3 axis normal, and another one if for 3 axis normal and 3D.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhracturedBlue
- Offline
- Posts: 4402
The new code isn't using the common lfsr which it really should, but that is a minor nit.
Only updating the output data once per frequency change seems like a downgrade unless this is specifically shown to be necessary.
I can't really evaluate the code changes, since as noted the code is a complete rewrite. I didn't write the original though, and if there is enough confirmation that this is better, I probably wouldn't be against replacing it wholesale with jimqjp's.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hugizounet
- Offline
- Posts: 2
thanks a lot
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hugizounet
- Offline
- Posts: 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chaos1
- Offline
- Posts: 11
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- aMax
- Offline
- Posts: 776
Really? Main Menu...."supported models" should have raised your interest.chaos1 wrote: .......I can not find anything that has been updated on my own searching thank you in advance PS. I have the tx from the v922 if that makes any difference....
docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Any...kE&usp=sharing#gid=0
You will need a nrf24L01+ module.
Devo7e, TaranisQ X7, R9M , 4in1 MM, Futaba FC18plusV3.2 & DFT/FLD-02
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chaos1
- Offline
- Posts: 11
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Moeder
- Offline
- Posts: 796
PhracturedBlue wrote: I can't really evaluate the code changes, since as noted the code is a complete rewrite. I didn't write the original though, and if there is enough confirmation that this is better, I probably wouldn't be against replacing it wholesale with jimqjp's.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- robbe
- Offline
- Posts: 10
i am new to this forum and the reason i bought a DEVO 10 TX was, that I wanted to fly my v977 with it.
So, I installed appropiate modul and nightly, but the result in controlling the v977 was disappointing (sticky controls, short range).
After installing the Patch from here everything went fine
Controls are smooth and range is much better.
So I can recommend this patch and would like to have it integrated in Deviation.
Thanks a lot for your work on the Deviation project!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Moeder
- Offline
- Posts: 796
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- robbe
- Offline
- Posts: 10
Everything worked good, no lags, good response.
I used the model file from this site .
Is that patch a variant from the one I mentionend before?
PS:
Babay wrote in this post : Hover Debugging is working also.
Does anyone knows, how to enable Hover Debugging?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Moeder
- Offline
- Posts: 796
robbe wrote: Did a short test with the provided patch on the v977: only 5 minutes just hovering indoor due to bad weather .
Everything worked good, no lags, good response.
I used the model file from this site .
Is that patch a variant from the one I mentionend before?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ahmadie
- Offline
- Posts: 9
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Protocol Development
- V977 on 7e