LT8900 support

More
15 Apr 2016 15:16 - 15 Apr 2016 15:20 #46572 by planger
Replied by planger on topic LT8900 support
The RF chip on Shenqi was not written but from what I've seen from air it did follow the datasheet.
There are a lot of restrictions in the emulation like max number of bytes, method of air transfer, fec, whitening...
What I did was an attempt to get at least some parts compatible. May be Shenqi will be the only protocol using that layer...
Last edit: 15 Apr 2016 15:20 by planger.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Apr 2016 15:18 - 15 Apr 2016 15:53 #46573 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic LT8900 support
Sorry, I didn't work on whitening yet because I've seen in the datasheet that it could be given different seeds, so it's not as simple as on the xn297 or HS6200. I'll have a look only if a protocol requires it, looks like it's disabled by default.
Last edit: 15 Apr 2016 15:53 by goebish.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 Jul 2016 09:12 #51482 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic LT8900 support
Seems all recent toys are shifting to LT8910/LT5910 chips :( ....

Start to be urgent to work on this emulation ....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 Jul 2016 19:20 #51487 by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic LT8900 support
LT5910? What models specifically?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 Jul 2016 06:23 #51504 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic LT8900 support

victzh wrote: LT5910? What models specifically?


The LT6910 is the MCU+LT8910 combo ... even cheaper for chinese toyquadcopters. All the last toys I reviewed have it now ... last JJRC, Global drones and many more.
I feel after the XN297shift, nos it's the LT8910 ... probably even cheaper .... for mass production

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 Jul 2016 08:05 #51511 by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic LT8900 support
Then if they start putting it in TX's as well we screwed. The price of entry rises from SPI logic analyzer to SDR.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 Jul 2016 08:07 #51512 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic LT8900 support

victzh wrote: Then if they start putting it in TX's as well we screwed. The price of entry rises from SPI logic analyzer to SDR.


No luckely the TX part is still LT8910 based .... so no real problem.... I can capture some data.... With a bit of luck,the datatate is one of the two in common with the nRF24L01+ (1mbits,250kbits)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
24 Jul 2016 16:28 - 24 Jul 2016 16:32 #52097 by naude
Replied by naude on topic LT8900 support

SeByDocKy wrote:

victzh wrote: Then if they start putting it in TX's as well we screwed. The price of entry rises from SPI logic analyzer to SDR.


No luckely the TX part is still LT8910 based .... so no real problem.... I can capture some data.... With a bit of luck,the datatate is one of the two in common with the nRF24L01+ (1mbits,250kbits)


Modelco mini 8 support

Hi everyone I have this nice little drone that I would like to work with my Devo 7e. The protocol you are already there?
I enclose a photo of the drone and the radio chipset.

Drone => hpics.li/52bf478

Chipset => hpics.li/c780744

www.datasheetspdf.com/PDF/LT8910/904972/4
Last edit: 24 Jul 2016 16:32 by naude.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2016 21:41 #52424 by Toxuin
Replied by Toxuin on topic LT8900 support
I am looking forward to have this chip supported by devo. I have a RX and TX from new FY326 that are LT8910 based and Saleae analyser. Should I capture some data? Is there anyone that could use those dumps to incorporate it into devo? I mean, I'd be glad to help, but writing RF protocols is far beyond my skill set.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.043 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum