- Posts: 277
FrskyX LBT EU
- Wene001
- Topic Author
- Offline
Are there some Infos out there about the new FrskyX LBT (Listen before talk) Protocol for us EU people?
Ther are rumors that this Protocol has a bit more range, too.
Greetz from Austria
Werner
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- aMax
- Offline
- Posts: 776
CC2500 modules (17.7 db).
The difference into range seems to be a 2.5 db higher output level with LBT. How they did this, I don't know, maybe this
power level was restricted on their hardware before LBT .
Edit:
If you refer to a certain YT vid ...this guy uses a X9E.
Devo7e, TaranisQ X7, R9M , 4in1 MM, Futaba FC18plusV3.2 & DFT/FLD-02
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Wene001
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 277
In fact there is some interest to use this Receivers.
I know downgrad is possible, but its not legal for new Receivers in the EU.
I have some Devo TXs and a new Taranis X9E (EU LBT) , and it would be great to use the new LBT Receivers vice versa.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- djdazzy
- Offline
- Posts: 54
It would be useful to have the LBT EU D16 protocol as well as the international version. I am not affected because my taranis was built in 2013 but many new FRSKY users are going to be affected by locked down transmitters only able to use the LBT format. I wouldn't be very happy if I had to reflash a Rx every time I wanted to swap transmitters.Wene001 wrote: in the moment it is only legal in the EU to buy and import Frsky Receivers with LBT Software.
In fact there is some interest to use this Receivers.
I know downgrad is possible, but its not legal for new Receivers in the EU.
I have some Devo TXs and a new Taranis X9E (EU LBT) , and it would be great to use the new LBT Receivers vice versa.
I have asked this question before and I think only very limited number of people are affected so there is no real interest..... I am happy to be corrected over this.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- djdazzy
- Offline
- Posts: 54
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Thomas.Heiss
- Offline
- Posts: 698
You won't get that with Devo TX, CC2500 and implemented FrSky/FrskyX or even FrskyX LBT own C implementations.
And XCiteRC KE is only valid for the original Devo transmitter with DEVO 3 channel DSSS protocol @ 10mw (no FHSS, no ETSI 1.8.1 compliance). Not any other stuff...
But I agree with you.
Flying DSMx (FHSS) "half-legal" (with no DeviationTX/Devo TX KE) at max. 100mw makes me feel better than this DEVO max 10mw stuff or suspended DSM2 stuff...at least there is a Spektrum genuine DSMx KE or this FHSS, even it does not apply for DeviationTX/Devos.
So, would you feel any better flying with no KE at all but with a "more FrskyX LBT-EU compliant" C protocol code?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cody
- Offline
- Posts: 19
I have a bunch of LBT receivers and would rather not downgrade them all.
I was unable to bind a D4R-II.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- djdazzy
- Offline
- Posts: 54
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Wene001
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 277
Any news on this for Deviation?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Offline
- Posts: 1891
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Protocol Development
- FrskyX LBT EU