- Posts: 127
Furibee F36 protocol attempt
- yets
- Offline
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SirDomsen
- Offline
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- magic_marty
- Offline
- Posts: 706
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SirDomsen
- Offline
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wasp09
- Offline
- Posts: 211
goebish wrote: I wouldn't count on it anytime soon
My Jan 15 order of F36 is still no show, got refunded after dispute. With no deviation support I don't think I would reorder the F36.
Perhaps I'll spend that money to beef up motors and battery for my H36.
Please remember you still have a H20H protocol waiting for you to finish.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DIGGIDY
- Offline
- Posts: 26
www.deviationtx.com/forum/model-requests...-f36-needs-deviation
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
The H8 mini is using a XN297 while the F36 has an unknown RF core that can't be emulated with a nrf24l01.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wasp09
- Offline
- Posts: 211
BTW I have ordered an E011 to fill in the void. It is on its way via epacket. It should be faster than going through SG I hope.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
I didn't had much time to work on new protocols for the last 2 months, I should be back on track soon
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wasp09
- Offline
- Posts: 211
Plan B would be merging it with my H36 if I cannot stand the stock TX any more. I suppose it won't be too difficult transplanting the H36 FC into the F36 body.
Quick test by attaching a piece of AA battery (almost 14g) to the stock F36 showed that it could still take off. I should be able to use a bigger battery after mounting the FPV camera.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- UABMaddog
- Offline
- Posts: 6
I am finally getting into the protocol analyzing side of things.....I am a glutton for punishment...LOL
Right now I have a bit of personal time to invest in trying to get the F36 in Deviation......sure would love to fly it with my Devo 7E.......
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
I was able to dump data over the air with an HackRF ( see previous page ) but I'm not able to make sense of it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- UABMaddog
- Offline
- Posts: 6
Will let you know when I get this in the RF lab and see if they can get some sense of it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bikemike
- Offline
- Posts: 42
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- xxx
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 43
I wanted to get back to this, but suddenly I am in the middle of other things. The LT8900 did arrive, but it's kind of late
silverxxx
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- UABMaddog
- Offline
- Posts: 6
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wasp09
- Offline
- Posts: 211
It would fight for my 25mW AIO camera against my existing H36 and F36. I guess the F36 FC would be out since there is little hope on getting this protocol hacked out. E011 should have most power and FC should have been supported under bayang_nrf24l01.
++++++
The E011 arrived today. I ordered a mode 2 but I received a mode 1. I kept running it the wrong way as the sticks are reversed. I could not control it by crossing my hands. Had to fly it using my devo 10 right away.
The build quality of the E011 isn't that good. It came with loose and out of balanced props. The frame seems the weakest comparing to F36 and H36. I have also swapped the FCs of F36 and H36. In a sense I have more than enough to carry my FPV camera around. I can live without F36 protocol for now.
Thanks for attempting.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- martonmiklos
- Offline
First of all thank you for your all efforts in the reverse engineering of this beast!
If my understanding is correct the main issue is the fact that the MCU/RF piece is unknown.
If someone has least two dead boards or receiever ICs it might be useful to contact with zeptobars:
zeptobars.com/en/support-us
to see if they would have a willingness to decap and scan them.
It might show some directions about the chip/MCU type.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- martonmiklos
- Offline
Could you please check which pins of the receiever IC is GND, VCC and which pins are wired to the SCL, SDA testpads and to the antenna?
A quick google search with TSSOP24 2.4GHz MCU lead me to this IC:
www.nst-ic.com/f/1/1702115145.pdf
Could you please check if the pinout of this could match the IC's pinout on the board?
Thanks in advance! (My device is still on it's way from China, but I definitely would like to fly with a normal TX at some point.)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- xxx
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 43
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Protocol Development
- Furibee F36 protocol attempt