- Posts: 2631
protocol for WL Heli V911-s
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...911-s?start=20#71646
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BirdBarber
- Offline
- Hummingbird Assassin
- Posts: 134
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
In extreme cases there would be latency in controls, or no bind at all
The servo seems to move smoother probably because the pots in your Devo are better quality than the stock controller and Deviation does some filtering.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BirdBarber
- Offline
- Hummingbird Assassin
- Posts: 134
FYI: My 8S is using the NRF24L01 module with PA and LNA, and it has an external antenna. The 4-in-1 on my Devo 10 is one of the first built, back when you had to have a Chinese broker buy it direct from the manufacturer and then ship it to you. It seems like there might have been a change to the 4-in-1 since then, but I'm not positive. Seems like maybe it has something to do with the routing of the traces to the antenna, but again, I'm not positive. It wouldn't be that odd for the manufacturer to have changed parts suppliers once he went into full production also.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
Newer 4-in-1 modules are not better regarding this issue, but we can't blame the manufacturers, they follow the nrf24l01 datasheet, though they've already been told they should use better accuracy crystals ... but I'm not sure that would fix this problem anyway, that may even make it worse because of this +200kHz drift of the XN297. At least with a ±60ppm crystal there's a chance to have some + drift.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BirdBarber
- Offline
- Hummingbird Assassin
- Posts: 134
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
www.dropbox.com/sh/j63jhirsl3sius3/AAA-k...w11W_RjBuHgtZla?dl=0
But there's no reason that it can fix your issue with the Devo10 and 4-in-1 module, that was just a display bug, the protocol was still running as it should behind the scene.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BirdBarber
- Offline
- Hummingbird Assassin
- Posts: 134
I haven't tried the new code for the 8S, if it even exists. But yesterday's release always takes 2 tries to bind. The first one makes the receiver blink fast, but no bind. And the second attempt almost always binds, I have only had to try 3 times once. Once it's bound, it stays bound during power up/down cycles of both the TX and heli.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BirdBarber
- Offline
- Hummingbird Assassin
- Posts: 134
Also, I added info to my previous post.
I'm going to sleep in a bit, then gone most of tomorrow.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- planger
- Offline
Just a thought, you might want to try with the ID/freqs from the original TX just to eliminate this as the potential source of issue.
Pascal
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
www.dropbox.com/s/700asa17i7anivw/deviat...original-id.zip?dl=1
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BirdBarber
- Offline
- Hummingbird Assassin
- Posts: 134
I left the fixed id field blank, do I need to put the original ID in it?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BirdBarber
- Offline
- Hummingbird Assassin
- Posts: 134
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BirdBarber
- Offline
- Hummingbird Assassin
- Posts: 134
The bind button timer looked fine. But I did get one power on autobind the first time I power cycled the TX after trying the new protocol. But it never did it again.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- planger
- Offline
Another successful report: www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.php?p=40462565&postcount=12902
It's strange that no one is reporting issues on the Multi module. They all use a 4in1 RF board from the same designer...
Pascal
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BirdBarber
- Offline
- Hummingbird Assassin
- Posts: 134
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
uses an actual nrf24l01, not a xn297.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- goebish
- Offline
- I Void Warranties
- Posts: 2631
planger wrote: This protocol does not listen, it just sends...
Another successful report: www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.php?p=40462565&postcount=12902
It's strange that no one is reporting issues on the Multi module. They all use a 4in1 RF board from the same designer...
Pascal
That doesn't just depends on the Tx, but also the Rx, not long ago I sent a nrf24-multipro module to someone for his E010.
Before sending it I tested it with an E010 I've here, no problem.
When he received it, it didn't work with his E010 (no bind at all), but was working fine with his H36 (E010 clone...).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Protocol Development
- protocol for WL Heli V911-s