- Posts: 2631
JD 395 cx-10
09 Oct 2015 13:25 #38650
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10
Thanks for reporting, please post your .ini in the appropriate sub-forum once you're happy with them 
www.deviationtx.com/forum/model-configs
www.deviationtx.com/forum/model-configs
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
09 Oct 2015 14:01 #38655
by vasiliy_gr
Replied by vasiliy_gr on topic JD 395 cx-10
Checked the new build on CX-10A (Blue), DM007 and 33041. Everything ok execept one issue with the 33041. And it is my mistake earlier...
I mean that works everything except RTH on 33041. Certainly it is not P13.4, but 0x0004 on P13 (as headless on DM007)... Sorry. So it should be P13.2. I mean this code:
I mean that works everything except RTH on 33041. Certainly it is not P13.4, but 0x0004 on P13 (as headless on DM007)... Sorry. So it should be P13.2. I mean this code:
case FORMAT_MK33041:
packet[13] |= GET_FLAG(CHANNEL_PICTURE, BV(7))
| GET_FLAG(CHANNEL_RTH, BV(2)); // not | GET_FLAG(CHANNEL_RTH, BV(4));
packet[14] = GET_FLAG(CHANNEL_VIDEO, BV(0))
| GET_FLAG(CHANNEL_HEADLESS, BV(5));
break;Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
09 Oct 2015 14:12 #38657
by goebish
That's not my responsibility to push the pull requests to default branch (from which the nightly is built)
Regarding H7, I've put the pull request on hold because some people have reported my protocol works, but seems it's not the case for everyone ... (works fine with mine), could you check my test versions (from H7 & MT99xx threads) and report which one is working (or not) for you ?
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10
IKKI wrote: But as has already noticed someone missing several new protocols ... Since everything works you can do a Supercombo firmware? : P
Bayangtoys MJX and... H7?
That's not my responsibility to push the pull requests to default branch (from which the nightly is built)
Regarding H7, I've put the pull request on hold because some people have reported my protocol works, but seems it's not the case for everyone ... (works fine with mine), could you check my test versions (from H7 & MT99xx threads) and report which one is working (or not) for you ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 Oct 2015 08:04 #38680
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10
Wow, V686g is using a XN297 ?
This starts to be very confusing as the V686 is using a A7105 with a variant of the FlySky protocol
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...otocol-variant#29851
This starts to be very confusing as the V686 is using a A7105 with a variant of the FlySky protocol
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...otocol-variant#29851
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 Oct 2015 08:46 #38683
by Durete
Replied by Durete on topic JD 395 cx-10
Yep, after some time selling the V686G with the fantastic A7105, they moved this model to XN297.
Damn manufacturers!
Damn manufacturers!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 Oct 2015 06:04 - 11 Oct 2015 06:05 #38727
by SeByDocKy
Actually all toys are XN297 based, probably cheaper .... but max output power is 12dBm (AFAIK, I didn't see any TX with a LNA+PA).
It means that all last toys have a very poor range except if we fly them with a Devo
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic JD 395 cx-10
goebish wrote: Wow, V686g is using a XN297 ?
This starts to be very confusing as the V686 is using a A7105 with a variant of the FlySky protocol
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...otocol-variant#29851
Actually all toys are XN297 based, probably cheaper .... but max output power is 12dBm (AFAIK, I didn't see any TX with a LNA+PA).
It means that all last toys have a very poor range except if we fly them with a Devo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 Oct 2015 12:47 #38737
by dc59
I got the same result on my MK33041, Headless & RTH worked fine!!
Replied by dc59 on topic JD 395 cx-10
vasiliy_gr wrote:
I tested combo build on 33041 - now RTH works.hexfet wrote: I forgot to push the last Q282 changes that added support for V686g calibration before goebish pulled Q282. I've merged goebish's updates in my repo.
The protocol_combo test build is updated with the latest CX10 and MJQ, along with everything in default (Bayang and FY326 have been merged).
I got the same result on my MK33041, Headless & RTH worked fine!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 Nov 2015 17:17 #40275
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10
that doesn't need a new thread, post them here please
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Mar 2016 19:24 - 21 Mar 2016 13:15 #44836
by thecric
Replied by thecric on topic JD 395 cx-10
Hi guys,
will you do a deviated CX-10W ?
From theses pictures you can see a LT8910SSC 2.4G wireless module inside the transmitter.
Update: the picture above is from a FQ777-954
!!!
It seems the CX-10W is able to use the CX-10C transmitter as seen in this video
which means it should be already deviated
will you do a deviated CX-10W ?
From theses pictures you can see a LT8910SSC 2.4G wireless module inside the transmitter.
Update: the picture above is from a FQ777-954
!!!It seems the CX-10W is able to use the CX-10C transmitter as seen in this video
which means it should be already deviated
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
29 Mar 2016 19:18 #45396
by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic JD 395 cx-10
No, it's not all available data We know how its registers work, we know what it actually transmits over the air. This is much more important for its usage than various temperatures and dimensions.
But your document is very nicely done
We know how its registers work, we know what it actually transmits over the air. This is much more important for its usage than various temperatures and dimensions.But your document is very nicely done
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.087 seconds
-
Home
-
Forum
-
Development
-
Protocol Development
- JD 395 cx-10