- Posts: 2633
JJRC H26D
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- ajtank
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 278
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
20 Oct 2016 16:26 - 20 Oct 2016 16:31 #55205
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JJRC H26D
Ok, try this build, it should have arm on channel 5 (unlike the previous protocol I worked on, it shouldn't be toggled).
www.dropbox.com/s/b0rqzid06nt48wv/deviat...b5a_ch5_arm.zip?dl=1
- start with channel 5 low
- center throttle stick (may require a deadband so it's really centered)
- set channel 5 high
- fly
www.dropbox.com/s/b0rqzid06nt48wv/deviat...b5a_ch5_arm.zip?dl=1
- start with channel 5 low
- center throttle stick (may require a deadband so it's really centered)
- set channel 5 high
- fly
Last edit: 20 Oct 2016 16:31 by goebish.
- ajtank
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 278
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
- ajtank
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 278
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
20 Oct 2016 17:10 #55217
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JJRC H26D
No I think I understand how it works and I won't need another capture, just try this build when you can, it should have 100% rate:
www.dropbox.com/s/huc61o1vd5h3p8t/deviat...b5a_100rate.zip?dl=1
www.dropbox.com/s/huc61o1vd5h3p8t/deviat...b5a_100rate.zip?dl=1
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
20 Oct 2016 17:31 - 20 Oct 2016 17:33 #55220
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JJRC H26D
Pretty interesting, I tested the TX ID / RF channels you captured on the H26WH on the Eachine E010 and it works 
That means they're both the same (still uncracked) algo.
I'll implement every known TXID / RF channels sets (9) in the code, even if the algo is still unknown that should prevent interferences if many people are using those protocols in the same area at the same time.
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...ures?start=160#54330
That means they're both the same (still uncracked) algo.
I'll implement every known TXID / RF channels sets (9) in the code, even if the algo is still unknown that should prevent interferences if many people are using those protocols in the same area at the same time.
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...ures?start=160#54330
Last edit: 20 Oct 2016 17:33 by goebish.
- ajtank
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 278
21 Oct 2016 02:20 - 21 Oct 2016 05:32 #55239
by ajtank
Replied by ajtank on topic JJRC H26D
The full rate build can bind but no arming again. I have uploaded a new full rate capture: arm button / throttle up / throttle down
I retested the previous build. All channels are ok. I cannot fix my camera, the wifi just does not turn on. However I have used the logic analyzer to capture the camera signals: photo = 0.4s, video = 0.8s which are the same as the stock transmitter.
Regarding arming, I have used a trim button as momentary switch. Centre throttle>press trim to fly>throttle bottom to disarm.
I have been told that in the old days of analogue radio, users had to swap crystals to avoid collision. Now it looks like clashes could still happen even with the digital radio.
I retested the previous build. All channels are ok. I cannot fix my camera, the wifi just does not turn on. However I have used the logic analyzer to capture the camera signals: photo = 0.4s, video = 0.8s which are the same as the stock transmitter.
Regarding arming, I have used a trim button as momentary switch. Centre throttle>press trim to fly>throttle bottom to disarm.
I have been told that in the old days of analogue radio, users had to swap crystals to avoid collision. Now it looks like clashes could still happen even with the digital radio.
Last edit: 21 Oct 2016 05:32 by ajtank.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
21 Oct 2016 11:52 #55250
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JJRC H26D
New test build:
www.dropbox.com/s/tp33clovkdojhmu/deviat...0.0-6bc1aca.zip?dl=0
Once you've confirmed it's working fine (arm, 100% rate ...) I'll make another build with multiple txid/channels sets to confirm it's using the same than EAchine E010.
www.dropbox.com/s/tp33clovkdojhmu/deviat...0.0-6bc1aca.zip?dl=0
Once you've confirmed it's working fine (arm, 100% rate ...) I'll make another build with multiple txid/channels sets to confirm it's using the same than EAchine E010.
- ajtank
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 278
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
22 Oct 2016 18:20 - 22 Oct 2016 18:41 #55277
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JJRC H26D
Here's a last test build, please check that it works with a few different arbitrary fixed ID.
www.dropbox.com/s/0f3tscl8fa9z931/deviat...0.0-cf45175.zip?dl=1
www.dropbox.com/s/0f3tscl8fa9z931/deviat...0.0-cf45175.zip?dl=1
Last edit: 22 Oct 2016 18:41 by goebish.
- ajtank
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 278
23 Oct 2016 02:01 - 23 Oct 2016 02:02 #55294
by ajtank
Replied by ajtank on topic JJRC H26D
ID = 1111 and 2222, both can bind. BUT once throttle-up and armed, the motors kept running and WOULDN'T STOP by throttle-down. I had to remove the power of quad to stop. I am glad that I have removed the props for storage otherwise .....
If ID = none then operation is normal.
If ID = none then operation is normal.
Last edit: 23 Oct 2016 02:02 by ajtank.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
23 Oct 2016 02:11 #55296
by goebish
As I can't test by myself there's always a risk, always remove the props before testing, especially with bigger machines
Replied by goebish on topic JJRC H26D
ajtank wrote: I had to remove the power of quad to stop. I am glad that I have removed the props for storage otherwise .....
As I can't test by myself there's always a risk, always remove the props before testing, especially with bigger machines
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
23 Oct 2016 12:29 #55306
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JJRC H26D
Created a pull request
github.com/DeviationTX/deviation/pull/53
Waiting for a couple of reviews before it's added to nightly builds.
github.com/DeviationTX/deviation/pull/53
Waiting for a couple of reviews before it's added to nightly builds.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
23 Oct 2016 13:59 #55308
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JJRC H26D
Meanwhile, here a test build with H26WH + JXD 506 
www.dropbox.com/s/4yz5fhgtjaxatyj/deviat...0.0-8dbea70.zip?dl=0
www.dropbox.com/s/4yz5fhgtjaxatyj/deviat...0.0-8dbea70.zip?dl=0
Time to create page: 0.411 seconds
-
Home
-
Forum
-
Development
-
Protocol Development
- JJRC H26D