- Posts: 1868
New FrSkyX protocol
- hexfet
- Offline
This change fixes the LBT telemetry with my XSR. Wene001, are you able to test on an aircraft? I'd like to make sure the control link is not affected before making a pull request, but my XSR is not installed at the moment. Test build is here .Wene001 wrote: With Mikes changes my FrskyX telemetry is working reliable in International and LBT Mode.
Hope this works in Deviation, too...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Wene001
- Offline
- Posts: 277
Hope to find time for testing in the next days.
EDIT:
Made a short workbench test with a X6R in LBT Mode.
Link quality and telemetry stability looks fine now.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Offline
- Posts: 1868
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pulpfiction15
- Offline
- Posts: 86
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Fernandez
- Offline
- Posts: 983
To get 1000-2000 range, for D series, all scales must be at 125% for X series scales can be default 100%.
If we could adapt D-series protoco to same scales as X series protocol would be nice.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Fernandez
- Offline
- Posts: 983
But I am having hard times configuring deviation Frsky telemetry.
When checking U7E Transmitter telemetry monitor in U7E yes telemtry kicks in and I read as below, do we have a description what values are in the boxes?
In my case :
row1 82d 5.20V 0V
row2 200020 0v 0v
row3 0v 0v 0v
row4 0r 5.00V 0V
row5 0% 0V 0V
row6 0m 10.7V 0V
row7 0m 0m 0m
row8 47 -38d
ok then next question I go to Model > Main page Config > I select TelemVAmp and doing that I get 10.7 displayed on my tx main page, battery voltage of an empty 3s pack. Yes!
So now I want to setup an alarm for Battery voltage, I got to models telemetry config and want to select TelemVAmp, but hey it is not there can't select this?
Any input guys how do you use telemtry trila and error all fields? It would allready make a lot easier as we can see the value in telemetry config and set the alert same window? So could we not combine Telemetry monitor and Telemetry config under models?
Any ideas?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Offline
- Posts: 1868
The name difference is due to having both long and short names. Details are in telemetry/telem_frsky.c. Probably should be in the manual, but it's not complicated.
TelemV<x> = Volt<x>
TelemT<x> = Temp<x>
There's a bug where Volt3 is displayed as Volt5. Will fix presently.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Fernandez
- Offline
- Posts: 983
I confirm that it works VoltA has to beselcted in deviation telemetry config, it is the Betaflight Lipo Voltage sent over smartport.
In deviation main page config this is called TelemVAMP.
What is very nice in telemetry config, I see that is implemented a timer feature, so only if telemetry condition is met for set periode of time make the alert, so it should avoid beeping on lipo current sag. The receiver is the new micro XSR-R.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- antennenfreund
- Offline
- Posts: 20
"iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multiprotokoll"
With Frsky receivers there are unfortunately very strong range issues. Me and a friend of mine get a failsave after like 50-100 meters with Frsky!
"FrSky R-XSR Ultra SBUS / CPPM D16 16CH Mini Redundancy Receiver 1.5g for RC Multirotor FPV Racing Drone"
www.banggood.com/FrSky-R-XSR-Ultra-SBUS-...-FPV-Racing-Drone-p- 1186057.html? rmmds = search & cur_warehouse = USA
Does anyone else have the problem?
On "afdhs 2a" there were no range issues so far with an x6b reciever Unfortunately the receiver is too big for some builds.
This is the one: "Flysky X6B 2.4G 6CH i-BUS PPM PWM Receiver for AFHDS i10 i6s i6 i6x i4x Transmitter"
www.banggood.com/Flysky-X6B-2_4G-6CH-i-B...earch&cur_warehouse= USA
Are there any alternative for small recievers with rssi telemetry?
Is it maybe a BUG is the software of "Deviation"? (FrSky)
"iRangeX iRX-IR8M 2.4G 8CH Multiprotokoll"
There is also a problem with the included reciever, it only works in ppm, not sbus or ibus mode. This adds the issue that you cant set up a failsave properly and the quad stays armed, motors spinning so using that is just dangerous.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Fernandez
- Offline
- Posts: 983
Keep your RX-TX antenna at fixeddistance don't move. (fi 1m between them) try multiple bind and find the max and min bind, than set the Freq tune in the middle.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- antennenfreund
- Offline
- Posts: 20
Fernandez wrote: No problem Frsky gives an excellent range. Did you try to tune the frequncy fine tune setting in protocol options?
Keep your RX-TX antenna at fixeddistance don't move. (fi 1m between them) try multiple bind and find the max and min bind, than set the Freq tune in the middle.
Thanks for the answer. I have already done that before. There are problems with Frsky!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Blade81
- Offline
- Posts: 58
Can anyone advise?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CesiumSalami
- Offline
- Posts: 51
I don’t really notice a range difference between my Devo7e and Taranis X9D+ SE...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Blade81
- Offline
- Posts: 58
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- compman2
- Offline
- Posts: 65
computer nerd, hobby collector, proud father
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Offline
- Posts: 1868
This jogged a memory . Test builds available with 16 channels on FrskyX.compman2 wrote: Has there been any thought about supporting a full 16 channels on the frsky x protocol. I have run into a couple of situations where it would have been nice to have more than 12 channels.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- compman2
- Offline
- Posts: 65
computer nerd, hobby collector, proud father
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hexfet
- Offline
- Posts: 1868
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- compman2
- Offline
- Posts: 65
computer nerd, hobby collector, proud father
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Wene001
- Offline
- Posts: 277
Great work as always
I ve tested 16 Channel TestBuild with my Devo12s and 4in1
Tested with an Genuine X6R in EU Mode and a RX8R in FCC Mode.(tested in normal and 9-16Ch Mode)
Both S.Bus and Servo Outputs work fine with no jitter.
Signal seems stable, no problems with telemetry (in both EU and FCC)
Thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Home
- Forum
- Development
- Protocol Development
- New FrSkyX protocol